<h3><span><strong>A look at how HPLC injection principles have evolved</strong></span></h3><p><span><strong>Summer is approaching, so it is time to get your bicycle ready again. But the tyres are flat, and you start pumping them up. At first, inflating them is easy. As the pressure approaches the target value of around 4 bar, however, every additional stroke requires noticeably more force. Adding more air to an already pressurized system becomes increasingly difficult.</strong></span></p><p><span>High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) faces a comparable challenge, only on a much more demanding scale. Instead of pressures around 4 bar, modern HPLC and UHPLC systems may operate above 1,000 bar. And instead of air, they handle liquid mobile phases, often together with chemically hazardous substances. Introducing a sample into such a pressurized environment is therefore far from straightforward. The transition from early septum-based injection methods to automated sample introduction took decades, and development continues today as laboratories seek shorter cycle times, reduced sample consumption, lower carryover, and better data quality.</span></p><h4><span><strong>The beginnings of HPLC injection</strong></span></h4><p><span>By the 1950s, gravitational liquid chromatography had already been used for almost half a century. Its further development, however, was limited by two major technical challenges: the introduction of smaller stationary-phase particles and the need to operate at much higher pressures.</span></p><p><span>Around 1965, Csaba Horváth and his colleagues successfully addressed these limitations by developing one of the first HPLC systems. Since then, continuous technical innovation has transformed HPLC into one of the most robust, precise, and widely used separation techniques in analytical laboratories.</span></p><p><span>In the earliest HPLC systems, samples were introduced manually. Analysts either injected directly into a pressurized system or temporarily stopped the mobile-phase flow to introduce the sample. Neither approach offered particularly good reproducibility or quantitative precision. The growing demand for reliable analytical results therefore created a clear need for standardized and more controlled injection technology.</span></p><h4><span><strong>The invention of the six-port rotary valve</strong></span></h4><p><span>A major breakthrough came with the development of the multi-port rotary sampling valve in the late 1970s. This principle became the foundation of modern HPLC injection systems.</span></p><p><span>The most common configuration is the <strong>six-port valve with a defined sample loop</strong>. Its stator contains six ports: two connect to the chromatographic system, two are used for sample introduction and waste, and the remaining two connect to the sample loop. The actual switching of flow paths is performed by a rotor seal pressed against the back of the stator. Precisely manufactured grooves in the rotor determine how the ports are interconnected.</span></p><p><span>The system operates in two main positions: <strong>LOAD</strong> and <strong>INJECT</strong>.</span></p><p><span>In the LOAD position, the analyst fills the sample loop manually with a syringe while the mobile phase continues to flow directly from the pump to the analytical column. Once the valve is rotated into the INJECT position, the filled sample loop becomes part of the high-pressure mobile-phase pathway and the sample is swept onto the column.</span></p><p><span>This principle provides a defined and comparatively safe way of introducing the sample without interrupting the chromatographic flow.</span></p><p><span>Today, KNAUER offers a broad portfolio of manually and electrically actuated valves, including two-position, multiposition, and special-purpose designs. The <strong>AZURA V 4.1 valve</strong> series can be integrated into modern chromatographic systems and adapted to a variety of applications.</span></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_1_6_port_2_position_valve_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_AZURA_V_4_1_valve_ec0dd2b773.webp" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 1 - 6-port 2-position valve. Left: LOAD. Right: INJECT. Bottom: KNAUER AZURA V 4.1 valve." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_1_6_port_2_position_valve_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_AZURA_V_4_1_valve_ec0dd2b773.webp 203w," sizes="100vw" width="1024" height="785"></p><p><span>Despite the major improvement represented by rotary injection valves, manual injection soon became a limitation as HPLC gained popularity in routine analytical laboratories.</span></p><p><span>Every sample still required an operator to physically rotate the valve. As sample numbers increased, this significantly limited laboratory throughput. Injection quality was also influenced by operator technique. Differences in sample-loop filling and the exact timing of valve switching could affect reproducibility.</span></p><p><span>Automation therefore became the logical next step.</span></p><h4><span><strong>Injection principles used in autosamplers</strong></span></h4><p><span>Autosamplers emerged during the mid-1980s, while the injection valve remained the central element of the design. As an interesting historical note, KNAUER had already become the first European manufacturer of modular HPLC systems in 1976.</span></p><p><span>An autosampler is an electrically operated injection system equipped with a sample storage area, usually designed for vials or multiwell plates. Its performance can be evaluated using several important parameters.</span></p><ul><li><span><strong>Precision</strong> describes how reproducibly the system performs repeated injections. It is commonly assessed using the relative standard deviation (RSD) of peak areas or retention times from multiple measurements, often with five replicate injections.</span></li><li><span><strong>Linearity</strong> expresses whether the detector response changes proportionally with the injected sample volume. Ideally, increasing the injection volume step by step should produce a proportional increase in signal, with an R² value close to 1.</span></li><li><span><strong>Carryover</strong> occurs when traces of an analyte remain on the needle, within the valve, or inside the sample loop and subsequently contaminate the next analysis. Washing the needle and injection pathway can reduce this effect, although more extensive washing usually increases the total cycle time.</span></li><li><span><strong>Cycle time</strong> is another critical factor. Shorter cycles allow laboratories to process more samples per day and reduce both instrument occupancy and labor requirements. However, reducing cycle time can conflict with the need for additional washing steps to control carryover.</span></li></ul><p><span>Modern autosamplers generally use one of three fundamental injection concepts.</span></p><h4><span><strong>Pushed-loop injection</strong></span></h4><p><span>The <strong>pushed-loop design</strong> is probably the closest automated equivalent of traditional manual loop injection.</span></p><p><span>In the LOAD position, the sample is first aspirated into a dedicated aspiration capillary and temporarily stored outside the main chromatographic flow path. The injection needle then moves to a low-pressure needle port and pushes the sample into the bypassed sample loop.</span></p><p><span>After the loop has been filled, the valve switches to the INJECT position. The sample loop is then connected to the mobile-phase stream from the pump, and the analyte is transported toward the analytical column.</span></p><p><span>KNAUER's </span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/all/products/1454"><span><strong>Liquid Handler LH 8.1</strong></span></a><span> uses this straightforward pushed-loop principle and can be configured for high-throughput applications. Its large sample capacity and overlapped injection capabilities support automated workflows with high sample numbers.</span></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_2_Pushed_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_Sample_introduction_PUSH_Bottom_Left_INJECT_Bottom_Right_KNAUER_Liquid_Handler_LH_8_1_4d3df5b895.webp" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 2 Pushed-loop design. Left: LOAD. Right: Sample introduction (PUSH). Bottom Left: INJECT. Bottom Right: KNAUER Liquid Handler LH 8.1." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_2_Pushed_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_Sample_introduction_PUSH_Bottom_Left_INJECT_Bottom_Right_KNAUER_Liquid_Handler_LH_8_1_4d3df5b895.webp 243w," sizes="100vw" width="1920" height="1235"></p><h4><span><strong>Pulled-loop injection</strong></span></h4><p><span>The <strong>pulled-loop design</strong> approaches sample introduction from the opposite direction.</span></p><p><span>Instead of using a separate aspiration capillary, the sample loop itself is used for aspiration. During the LOAD phase, the analyte is drawn directly into the loop. When the valve changes to the INJECT position, the sample loop becomes part of the main chromatographic flow path.</span></p><p><span>At the same time, the injection syringe can move to a wash position to reduce residual contamination.</span></p><p><span>Because the design eliminates the need for a low-pressure needle port and additional aspiration capillaries, it reduces the number of potential leakage points and can lower operating and maintenance costs.</span></p><p><span>KNAUER uses this robust and cost-efficient concept in the </span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/all/products/2375"><span><strong>AZURA AS 6.1L autosampler</strong></span></a><span>. The instrument is available in several configurations, including temperature-controlled, biocompatible, preparative, and UHPLC versions.</span></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_3_Pulled_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_autosampler_AZURA_AS_6_1_L_43a4e8c44a.webp" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 3 - Pulled-loop design. Left: LOAD. Right: INJECT. Bottom: KNAUER autosampler AZURA ​AS 6.1L." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_3_Pulled_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_autosampler_AZURA_AS_6_1_L_43a4e8c44a.webp 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1024" height="639"></p><h4><span><strong>Full-loop, partial-loop, and µL pickup modes</strong></span></h4><p><span>Pulled-loop systems typically provide several injection modes, each offering a different compromise between precision, flexibility, and sample consumption.</span></p><ul><li><span>In <strong>full-loop injection</strong>, the entire sample loop is filled. This generally provides the highest precision and reproducibility because the injected volume is defined by the physical volume of the loop. The disadvantage is relatively high sample consumption, since the capillary between the needle and the loop must be flushed and the loop itself is usually overfilled to ensure complete filling.</span></li><li><span><strong>Partial-loop injection</strong> provides greater flexibility because different injection volumes can be selected without changing the sample loop. This approach is useful for applications such as dilution series. However, the tubing between the injection needle and the loop still needs to be flushed, resulting in additional sample consumption.</span></li><li><span>The <strong>µL pickup</strong> mode is designed to minimize sample loss. Only the exact amount required for injection is aspirated, while transport solvent is used to move the sample through the tubing. This makes µL pickup particularly attractive when sample availability is limited or when precious samples are being analyzed.</span></li></ul><p><span>Even with these designs, there remained room for improvement. The next development step focused on reducing sample consumption and carryover while shortening cycle times and maintaining high injection precision.</span></p><h4><span><strong>Split-loop injection</strong></span></h4><p><span>The modern <strong>split-loop design</strong> differs fundamentally from the previous concepts because the needle seat is located directly in the high-pressure flow path.</span></p><p><span>In the LOAD position, the system flow path is divided while the sample is aspirated directly into the injection needle. The outside of the needle can subsequently be washed to remove potential contamination before the needle enters the high-pressure seat.</span></p><p><span>At first glance, this design may resemble the pushed-loop configuration. The critical difference, however, is that the sample needle itself becomes part of the chromatographic flow path.</span></p><p><span>The needle seat therefore operates under full system pressure. In modern UHPLC applications, this can exceed 1,000 bar. Consequently, the needle and seat must form a highly precise high-pressure seal capable of maintaining reliability over many injection cycles.</span></p><p><span>Once the needle is positioned in the seat, the valve switches to INJECT and the sample becomes fully integrated into the system flow path.</span></p><p><span>Because the mobile phase continuously passes through the needle during the chromatographic run, the internal needle surface is extensively rinsed with eluent. In many cases, this eliminates the need for additional internal needle-washing steps and contributes to shorter cycle times.</span></p><p><span>With the <strong>AZURA AS 8.1L</strong>, KNAUER introduces a modern autosampler based on this state-of-the-art split-loop principle for HPLC and UHPLC applications.</span></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_4_Split_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_autosampler_AZURA_AS_8_1_L_ff89233502.webp" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 4 Split-loop design. Left: LOAD. Right: INJECT. Bottom: KNAUER autosampler AZURA AS 8.1L." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_4_Split_loop_design_Left_LOAD_Right_INJECT_Bottom_KNAUER_autosampler_AZURA_AS_8_1_L_ff89233502.webp 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1024" height="684"></p><p><span>The split-loop approach can substantially reduce sample loss, shorten cycle times, minimize carryover, and provide high injection precision.</span></p><p><span>However, these advantages come with slightly greater mechanical complexity. For reliable long-term operation, the high-pressure sampling needle and the corresponding needle seat should be maintained regularly, typically on an annual basis.</span></p><h4><span><strong>Pulled-loop versus split-loop</strong></span></h4><p><span>Both injection concepts have advantages, and the preferred design depends on the analytical application.</span></p><p><span>The <strong>AZURA AS 6.1L pulled-loop system</strong> offers greater mechanical simplicity and flexibility and generally places lower demands on maintenance. It also benefits from a comparatively low dwell volume.</span></p><p><span>The <strong>AZURA AS 8.1L split-loop system</strong>, on the other hand, provides advantages in sample conservation, cycle time, carryover performance, and injection precision.</span></p><div><div><div><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Tab_1_Brief_site_by_site_comparison_of_KNAUER_s_AS_6_1_L_pulled_loop_and_AS_8_1_L_split_loop_c28ce01ff3.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Tab. 1 Brief site-by-site comparison of KNAUER's AS 6.1L (pulled-loop) and AS 8.1L (split-loop)." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Tab_1_Brief_site_by_site_comparison_of_KNAUER_s_AS_6_1_L_pulled_loop_and_AS_8_1_L_split_loop_c28ce01ff3.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1061" height="381"></p></div></div></div><p><span>The choice therefore depends on whether the priority is mechanical simplicity and flexibility or maximum efficiency in terms of sample consumption, speed, and injection performance.</span></p><h4><span><strong>Final thoughts</strong></span></h4><p><span>Sample injection may appear to be one of the simplest steps in an HPLC workflow, but its development shows how much engineering is required to introduce a few microliters of sample accurately and reproducibly into a pressurized chromatographic system.</span></p><p><span>From early manual injection through six-port rotary valves and the first autosamplers to modern pushed-loop, pulled-loop, and split-loop designs, each generation has addressed specific limitations of the previous approach.</span></p><p><span>The continuing evolution of injection technology reflects broader trends in liquid chromatography: laboratories expect higher throughput, better reproducibility, lower carryover, reduced sample consumption, and increasingly reliable unattended operation.</span></p><p><span>What appears today as a routine movement of a needle and switching of a valve is therefore the result of decades of development in chromatography, mechanical engineering, fluidics, and automation.</span></p>

A glimpse into the evolution of HPLC injection principles

News from LabRulezLCMS Library - Week 43, 2026

<div><p><strong>Sample preparation is a critical step in the analytical process, transforming raw samples into analysis-ready materials that significantly impact downstream applications. Mastering sample preparation is essential for producing high-quality, reliable data across various fields, such as environmental monitoring, pharmaceutical development, food safety testing, forensic analysis, and research.</strong></p><p>Proper preparation ensures that samples accurately represent the substance being analyzed, free from contamination or background interferences. Consistent sample preparation methods enable reproducibility, allowing experiments to be reliably replicated by different labs or on different days. Sample preparation also enhances sensitivity, because detecting trace substances is crucial across forensic, clinical research, pharmaceutical testing and more. Streamlining the preparation process reduces time and resources, making analysis more efficient and cost-effective.</p><p>This article provides an in-depth exploration of sample preparation techniques, covering their principles, applications, and best practices to facilitate informed decision-making and optimal analytical outcomes.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Types of Sample Preparation Techniques</strong></h3><p>Sample preparation techniques can be categorized into several types based on the sample state and analytical requirements.</p></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Solid Sample Preparation Techniques</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p><strong>Homogenization and Grinding:</strong> Homogenization and grinding involve breaking down large particles into a uniform mixture to ensure representative sampling, using methods such as mechanical grinding with ball mills or mortar and pestle, cryogenic grinding with liquid nitrogen, or ultrasonic homogenization.</p><ul><li><strong>Drying:</strong> Drying removes moisture from samples to prevent interference with analysis, through methods including oven drying, freeze-drying, vacuum drying, and spray drying.</li><li><strong>Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE):</strong> The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/all/products?category=136&amp;manufacturerItems=50"><strong>solid-phase extraction</strong></a> technique selectively retains analytes by retaining target analytes using solid sorbents, including reversed-phase sorbents like C18, normal-phase sorbents like silica, and ion-exchange sorbents like quaternary amine. A weak wash can be utilized to remove weakly bound sample impurities before a strong wash solvent releases the analytes for further analysis.</li><li><strong>Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME):</strong> SPME is a solvent-free extraction technique that uses fiber-based or in-tube SPME to extract analytes from samples.</li><li><strong>Protein Precipitation:</strong> A technique in clinical research labs, proteomics or drug discovery labs to separate proteins from a solution or complex mixture. The process involves loading sample onto a media, mixing or centrifugation and vacuum extraction to remove the sample protein free. This can also be done in a tube with solvents but requires more centrifugation and precision in pipetting. Additionally, protein precipitation plus phospholipid removal products allow for simultaneous removal of proteins and phospholipids for improved MS results.</li></ul></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Liquid Sample Preparation Techniques</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p><strong>Dilution and Filtration:</strong> Dilution and filtration involve reducing analyte concentration and removing particulate matter from liquid samples using membrane filtration, glass fiber filtration, or centrifugation.</p><ul><li><strong>Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE):</strong> LLE separates compounds based on solubility in two immiscible liquids, using techniques such as separatory funnel extraction or continuous liquid-liquid extraction.</li><li><strong>Supported/Solid Liquid Extraction (SLE) or called Liquid-Solid Extraction:</strong> Liquid-solid extraction transfers analytes from liquid to solid phase using solid-phase extraction or liquid-solid chromatography.</li><li><strong>Dialysis:</strong> Dialysis separates molecules based on size through diffusion across semi-permeable membranes.</li></ul></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Other Sample Preparation Techniques</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p><strong>QuEChERS:</strong> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.phenomenex.com/techniques/quechers"><strong>QuEChERS</strong></a><strong> </strong>(Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) is a sample preparation technique commonly used in analytical chemistry for food and environmental analyses. QuEChERS is favored for its simplicity, speed, and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for high-throughput laboratories analyzing complex matrices like fruits, vegetables, and other food products.</p><ul><li><strong>Microwave-Assisted Extraction:</strong> Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE) uses microwave energy to heat the solvent and sample, causing rapid thermal effects that enhance the extraction of target compounds. The microwave radiation penetrates the sample, leading to the vibration of polar molecules, which generates heat. This heating process disrupts the cell walls of plant or biological material, allowing faster and more efficient release of analytes into the solvent.</li><li><strong>Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction:</strong> Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction (UAE) employs high-frequency sound waves (ultrasound) to disrupt the cell structure of the sample material. Ultrasound causes cavitation (the formation of microbubbles) in the liquid, which collapses violently, generating localized high pressure and temperature. This leads to the breakdown of the sample matrix, enhancing mass transfer between the solvent and analyte.</li><li><strong>Supercritical Fluid Extraction:</strong> Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) involves using fluid at its supercritical state (above its critical temperature and pressure) to extract analytes. In this state, the fluid exhibits properties of both a gas and a liquid, allowing it to diffuse like a gas and dissolve substances like a liquid.</li><li><strong>Pressurized Liquid Extraction:</strong> Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE), also known as accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), uses solvents at elevated and high pressures to extract analytes from solid or semi-solid matrices. Under these conditions, the solvent's viscosity and surface tension are reduced, improving its ability to penetrate the sample matrix and dissolve the analytes more efficiently.</li><li><strong>Immunocapture:</strong> A technique that uses antibodies to selectively isolate and concentrate specific target molecules, such as proteins, from a complex mixture. This method leverages the high specificity of antibodies for their antigens (target molecules) to achieve purification and enrichment of the target, which can then be analyzed or further processed.</li></ul></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Optimizing and Implementing Sample Preparation Techniques</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p>Validating and optimizing sample preparation methods is crucial to ensure accuracy, precision, and reliability. This involves evaluating several parameters, including recovery, precision, accuracy, robustness, and selectivity. Method validation protocols typically involve verifying the method's performance characteristics, such as detection limits, quantitation limits, and linearity.</p><p>Optimization techniques, such as experimental design and response surface methodology, help refine the sample preparation process. These approaches enable analysts to systematically evaluate the effects of various factors, including extraction solvent, temperature, and time, on the method's performance.</p><p>Even with validated and optimized methods, several issues may arise during <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.phenomenex.com/techniques/sample-preparation"><strong>sample preparation</strong></a>.</p><ul><li>Contamination can occur through improper handling, storage, or equipment cleaning, leading to inaccurate results.</li><li>Analyte loss, low recovery, or degradation can result from inadequate stabilization, storage, or handling procedures.</li><li>Inconsistent results may stem from variations in the sample matrix, instrumentation, wrong solvent/phase selection, or operator technique.</li><li>Instrument malfunctions can compromise results.</li></ul><p>To address the common challenges in sample preparation, laboratories should identify root causes and apply corrective measures, such as re-examining sample handling and storage procedures, verifying instrument calibration, or adjusting method parameters. Additionally, following best practices and safety considerations is crucial to prevent accidents and ensure a safe working environment. This includes wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) and adhering to laboratory safety protocols for waste disposal and chemical handling.</p><p>Regular quality control measures are also vital to ensure reliable results. Laboratories should implement standard operating procedures (SOPs), verify reagent purity and stability, monitor environmental conditions, and maintain instruments through regular calibration and maintenance. Furthermore, continuous training and competency assessment for laboratory personnel are essential.</p><p>Implementation of these measures is crucial for laboratories to ensure the quality and reliability of their sample preparation methods, ultimately supporting accurate and meaningful analytical results.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p>Robust sample preparation has proven instrumental in fields like environmental monitoring (e.g., detecting isolating pollutants using SPE), pharmaceutical development (e.g., bioanalytical testing with LLE and SPME), and food safety clean-up (e.g., QuEChERS for pesticide residue analysis).</p><p>As analytical chemistry evolves, emerging trends like automation, miniaturization, and green chemistry will further enhance efficiency, sensitivity, and sustainability for sample preparation techniques. Ultimately, high-quality sample preparation is essential for delivering accurate, reliable, and groundbreaking research outcomes.</p></div>

Sample Preparation Techniques for Precision in Analysis

Article

Application

Academy

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Phenomenex is a global technology leader committed to developing novel analytical chemistry solutions that solve the separation and purification challenges of researchers in industrial, government and academic laboratories.

Phenomenex

Based in Berlin, KNAUER is a medium-sized, owner-managed company that has been serving the sciences since 1962. We develop and manufacture scientific instruments of superior quality for liquid chromatography, including: Analytical HPLC/UHPLC, Preparative HPLC, Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC), Multi-column chromatography/Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography. High pressure dosing, in-line detection systems, and osmometry are additional business areas.

KNAUER

Peak Scientific Genius NM32LA nitrogen generator NM32LA (Refurbished)

The Genius NM32LA from Peak Scientific is a proven and highly trusted nitrogen generator, specifically developed to meet the demands of LC-MS applications.

Marketplace products from category Laboratory gases and gas generators - page 2

Related content

Sample Preparation Techniques for Precision in Analysis

News from LabRulezLCMS Library - Week 43, 2026

A glimpse into the evolution of HPLC injection principles