Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have earned the moniker "forever chemicals" due to their extreme persistence in the environment. Their detection is crucial for protecting public health and the environment as these synthetic compounds continue to pose significant challenges worldwide. This comprehensive exploration examines why PFAS detection matters, current detection methods, and future directions in addressing PFAS contamination.<h3>Understanding PFAS and Their Health Impacts</h3>PFAS are a class of synthetic organic compounds with diverse structures, properties, and uses. Despite their diversity, all PFAS contain perfluoroalkyl moieties that are extremely resistant to environmental and metabolic degradation [1]. This high persistence is a defining characteristic that makes PFAS management particularly challenging.<h3>Documented Health Effects</h3>Current scientific research has linked PFAS exposure to numerous adverse health outcomes:<ul><li>Reproductive effects including decreased fertility and increased high blood pressure in pregnant women [8]</li><li>Developmental effects in children such as low birth weight, accelerated puberty, and behavioral changes [8]</li><li>Reduced immune system function, including decreased vaccine response</li><li>Interference with natural hormones and endocrine disruption</li><li>Increased cholesterol levels and obesity risk</li><li>Increased risk of several cancers, including prostate, kidney, testicular, oral cavity/pharynx, brain, and endocrine cancers [3]</li></ul>A 2023 study linked PFAS-contaminated water with up to a 33% increase in cancer incidence in affected areas [3]. The study compared regions with elevated PFAS levels to cancer data from the National Cancer Institute, finding higher incidences of various cancers after controlling for factors like smoking and obesity.<h3>Environmental Persistence and Contamination</h3>The extreme persistence of PFAS represents a fundamental concern for environmental management. PFAS are considered the most environmentally persistent substances among organic chemicals [7]. This persistence means that even if all PFAS uses were immediately phased out, existing contamination would continue to affect ecosystems and water supplies for generations.A 2023 study at a military fire training site estimated that PFAS contamination will persist for centuries without remediation [7]. The research found that terminal PFAS still exceed regulatory limits by 2000-fold decades after aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) use ceased, with precursors accounting for around half of the extractable organofluorine across years.<h3>Current Detection Methods</h3><h4>EPA Standardized Methods</h4>The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed several standardized methods for PFAS detection, each with specific applications and capabilities:<h5>EPA Method 533</h5><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/epa-533-drying-down-pfas-samples-after-spe">EPA Method 533</a> focuses on "short chain" PFAS with carbon chain lengths of C4 to C12. Released in December 2019, this method complements Method 537.1 and includes several key features:<ul><li>Uses isotope dilution quantification approach with extracted internal standards, which reduces overall analytical uncertainty</li><li>Employs weak anion exchange solid phase extraction cartridges as opposed to polystyrene divinylbenzene used in 537.1</li><li>Can analyze 25 PFAS compounds, including additional short-chain PFAS that were not apart of Method 537.1</li><li>Allows for longer holding times: 28 days to extraction and 28 days to analyze (compared to 14 days to extraction in Method 537.1)</li><li>Uses ammonium acetate as a preservative (versus Trisma in Method 537.1) [1]</li></ul><h5>EPA Method 537/537.1</h5><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/sample-concentration-epa-method-537-pfas-determination">EPA Method 537 </a>was first published in 2009 for the determination of 14 PFAS in drinking water [6]. It was later updated to Method 537.1 in 2018 (with editorial updates in 2020) to expand its capabilities:<ul><li>Uses<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.organomation.com/what-is-solid-phase-extraction-spe"> solid phase extraction (SPE) </a>and<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.organomation.com/preparing-samples-for-lc-ms/ms-analysis"> liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)</a></li><li>Method 537.1 expanded detection to 18 PFAS compounds, including HFPO-DA (one component of GenX technology)</li><li>Utilizes styrene-divinylbenzene (SDVB) media for extraction</li><li>Requires samples to be extracted within 14 days and analyzed within 28 days</li><li>Methanol is used to elute the extracts. This should then be reconstituted with a 96:4 methanol:water mixture [1]</li></ul>Together, Methods 533 and 537.1 can detect a total of 29 unique PFAS compounds in drinking water and are approved for monitoring under the fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) and the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation [1] [3].<h5>EPA Method 1633</h5><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/preparing-diverse-sample-matrices-for-epa-method-1633">EPA Method 1633</a>, released in 2024, represents a significant advancement in PFAS analysis:<ul><li>Developed for the analysis of 40 PFAS compounds in various matrices, including surface water, groundwater, wastewater, soil, biosolids, sediment, landfill leachate, and fish tissue</li><li>Expands beyond the drinking water focus of Methods 533 and 537.1</li><li>Provides a standardized approach that may replace modified drinking water methods (i.e., modified EPA 537) that were previously used for non-drinking water matrices [1]</li></ul><h4>Conventional Analytical Techniques</h4>The gold standard for PFAS analysis involves chromatographic techniques coupled with mass spectrometry:<ul><li>Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the most widely used method for PFAS analysis, offering high sensitivity and specificity [1]</li><li>High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) allows for rapid detection and identification of PFAS species at very low concentrations [5]</li></ul>These techniques can detect PFAS at parts per trillion (ppt) levels, which is essential given the low concentrations at which PFAS can cause health effects [1]. However, these methods require sophisticated equipment, specialized training, and significant financial resources, making them inaccessible in many regions, particularly in developing countries.<h4>Emerging Detection Technologies</h4>Several innovative approaches are being developed to address the limitations of conventional methods:<ul><li>Electrochemical biosensors using modified electrodes have shown promise for selective PFAS detection with low detection limits [2]</li><li>Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) uses metallic nanoparticles and can be made into a portable method for on-site testing [1]</li><li>Molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) offer thermal and physical stability, reusability, and low-cost synthesis for PFAS detection [6]</li></ul>These emerging technologies aim to provide more accessible, field-deployable, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional laboratory-based methods.<h3>Challenges in PFAS Detection</h3><h4>Analytical Challenges</h4>Detecting PFAS presents several technical challenges:<ul><li>The ubiquity of PFAS in laboratory equipment and accessories can lead to background contamination when measuring at parts-per-trillion levels [1]</li><li>Many components in liquid chromatographs, mass spectrometers, and solid-phase extraction systems contain materials that can leach PFAS compounds [9]</li><li>The vast number of PFAS (thousands of compounds) makes comprehensive detection difficult, as analytical standards are only available for a small subset [1]</li><li>Complex matrices like food and environmental samples require sophisticated sample preparation techniques</li></ul><h4>Global Disparities in Detection Capabilities</h4>Access to PFAS detection technology varies significantly worldwide:<ul><li>Many developing regions, particularly in Africa, lack adequately equipped laboratories with the necessary instrumentation to detect and measure PFAS</li><li>There is often a scarcity of qualified professionals with experience in PFAS analysis in these regions</li><li>The high cost of acquiring and maintaining sophisticated analytical instruments presents a substantial obstacle to conducting extensive PFAS investigations in resource-limited settings [1]</li><li>Competing priorities such as infectious diseases, poverty, and food security often divert attention and resources from environmental pollutants like PFAS</li></ul><h4>Regulatory Landscape and Compliance</h4>The regulatory framework for PFAS is evolving rapidly worldwide:<ul><li>The EPA finalized Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act in September 2024, requiring manufacturers and importers to report on their use of PFAS since 2011 [10]</li><li>Electronic reporting for PFAS will open on July 11, 2025, with final reporting deadlines in 2026</li><li>Companies must report detailed information including chemical identity, production volumes, industrial and consumer products, worker exposure, and disposal methods [10]</li></ul>These regulations are driving demand for more effective and accessible PFAS detection methods to ensure compliance and protect public health.<h3>Future Directions in PFAS Detection</h3><h4>Technological Advancements</h4>The future of PFAS detection lies in developing more accessible, sensitive, and comprehensive methods:<ul><li>Non-targeted screening methods that can identify unknown PFAS compounds without requiring analytical standards for each specific compound</li><li>Total fluorine analysis techniques like Adsorbable Organic Fluorine and Total Oxidizable Precursor Assay that can quantify the presence of fluorine atoms within a sample [1]</li><li>Portable sensors and field-deployable technologies that enable on-site monitoring and rapid response to contamination events</li><li>AI-driven solutions that can improve data analysis and interpretation for complex PFAS mixtures</li></ul><h4>Collaborative Approaches</h4>Addressing the global challenge of PFAS detection requires coordinated efforts:<ul><li>International partnerships between researchers in developed and developing regions to enhance expertise and capacity building</li><li>Standardization of analytical methods to ensure consistency and comparability of results across different laboratories and regions</li><li>Open data sharing and collaboration across countries to leverage collective knowledge and resources</li><li>Integration of PFAS monitoring into broader environmental and public health surveillance systems</li></ul><h3>Conclusion</h3>The detection of PFAS is not merely a technical challenge but a critical public health and environmental imperative [1]. As these "forever chemicals" continue to persist in our environment, developing effective, accessible, and comprehensive detection methods becomes increasingly important. By advancing detection technologies, strengthening regulatory frameworks, and fostering global collaboration, we can better understand, monitor, and ultimately mitigate the impacts of PFAS contamination.The EPA's standardized methods (533, 537.1, and 1633) provide crucial tools for monitoring PFAS in various environmental matrices, but continued innovation is needed to address the full spectrum of PFAS compounds and to make detection more accessible globally [1] [6]. The path forward requires sustained investment in research and development, capacity building in resource-limited settings, and a commitment to environmental justice that ensures all communities have access to the tools and information needed to protect themselves from PFAS exposure. Only through such comprehensive approaches can we hope to address the complex challenges posed by these persistent pollutants.Be sure to check out our other installments of our&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/introducing-our-environmental-contaminants-series-making-sense-of-the-alphabet-soup">Environmental Contaminant Series</a>&nbsp;covering&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/the-importance-of-detecting-persistent-organic-pollutants-pops">Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)</a>,&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/the-importance-of-detecting-polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbons-pahs">Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)</a>,&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/the-importance-of-detecting-semi-volatile-organic-compounds-svocs">Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)</a>, and <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://blog.organomation.com/blog/the-importance-of-detecting-polychlorinated-biphenyls-pcbs">Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)</a>.

The Importance of Detecting Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

Scientists at CEITEC Brno University of Technology have developed microscopic robots that could one day accelerate beer production and simplify food quality control. The magnetically controlled biobots can actively mix liquids during fermentation, speed up the process, and separate themselves from the finished product once fermentation is complete. The results of the research, carried out by Professor Martin Pumera’s team, were published in the journal ACS Nano.“When people hear the word ‘robot’ today, they often imagine an electronic device. In reality, however, a robot can be any system capable of autonomously performing a specific task,” explains Martin Pumera of CEITEC Brno University of Technology.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_7d9ff82875.jpeg" alt="CEITEC BUT/Jakub Rozboud: CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control: Martin Pumera in his lab at CEITEC BUT." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_7d9ff82875.jpeg 235w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="1067">The research team created so-called biobots—biohybrid microrobotic capsules containing brewer’s yeast and magnetic nanoparticles. When the yeast produces carbon dioxide during fermentation, the resulting bubbles cause the biobots to move up and down through the liquid. This naturally mixes the contents of the vessel and makes fermentation more efficient. Compared with conventional static particles, the biobots can therefore accelerate chemical processes that are important in food production.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_4_af5fd4611f.jpg" alt="CEITEC BUT/Martin Pumera's archive: CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control: Hematite microrobot (image for illustrative purposes)." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_4_af5fd4611f.jpg 209w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="1192">Another major advantage of the technology is that the biobots can be easily separated from the finished beverage. Thanks to the magnetic particles they contain, they can be controlled with a magnetic field and removed once fermentation is complete, eliminating the need for additional filtration. The researchers also demonstrated that the biobots can be reused over several production cycles.“Unlike conventional static particles, microrobots actively move throughout the entire volume of the liquid, allowing them to cover a larger area and make the whole process more efficient. At the same time, they also facilitate the automation of production,” adds Martin Pumera. The team is currently discussing potential applications of the technology with a major European brewery.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_3_e8e5a3a55a.jpg" alt="CEITEC BUT/Martin Pumera's archive: CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control: g-C₃N₄ microrobots (image for illustrative purposes)." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_3_e8e5a3a55a.jpg 158w," sizes="100vw" width="1476" height="1460">Martin Pumera’s group has long been exploring the use of microrobots and advanced materials in the food industry. In the past, for example, the team developed a flexible sensor for smart packaging capable of detecting spoiled fish. The new biobots therefore represent another step towards more advanced methods of food quality and safety control.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_2_75c7fed958.jpeg" alt="CEITEC BUT/ACS Nano: CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control: ACS Nano - cover featuring article by Martin Pumera et al." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CEITEC_Mikroroboti_z_CEITEC_mohou_urychlit_vyrobu_piva_i_kontrolu_kvality_potravin_2_75c7fed958.jpeg 117w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="2128">

 CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control 

In this episode of ‪ChromatographyTalk‬, ‪Organomation‬ General Manager David Oliva sits down with Michelle Taylor, Editor-in-Chief of LabCompare, to go behind the scenes of their groundbreaking two-part documentary series on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).The conversation kicks off with a startling revelation: many of the world’s leading PFAS experts have completely stopped eating seafood due to high contamination levels discovered during testing. From there, we dive deep into the technical and regulatory challenges facing today's analytical laboratories.<h4>In this episode, we discuss:</h4><ul><li>The Laboratory Throughput Crisis: Why labs are currently "overwhelmed with samples" and how tiered testing—using single quad instruments for screening before moving to triple quads—is helping to manage capacity without sacrificing sensitivity.</li><li>The Battle Against Background Contamination: Why PTFE-free (PFAS-free) laboratory equipment is no longer optional when trying to detect "forever chemicals" at the parts-per-trillion and parts-per-quadrillion levels.</li><li>Complex Matrices (Seafood &amp; Packaging): The technical hurdles of analyzing high-lipid samples like fish and the rising demand for migration testing as states like Rhode Island begin to phase out PFAS in food packaging.</li><li>Global Regulatory Shifts: A look at the "dual compliance model" required for labs supporting international exporters, especially with the European Union’s stricter enforcement compared to the U.S. monitoring approach.</li><li>The "Grand Challenge" of Unknowns: How EPA Method 1621 (Total Organic Fluorine) is helping labs close the mass balance gap and why the next generation of bench chemists must embrace *AI and data science* to manage the massive datasets generated by high-resolution mass spectrometry.</li><li>PFAS Destruction vs. Remediation: &nbsp;The promising (and problematic) methods for breaking the carbon-fluorine bond, and why incineration may inadvertently be spreading shorter-chain PFAS into the air.</li></ul>Whether you are a lab manager looking to future-proof your workflow or a chemist navigating the ever-evolving landscape of EPA Method 1633, this episode provides essential insights into the most pressing environmental crisis of our time.<h3>Video Transcription</h3><h4>Michelle Taylor: PFAS Testing Is Becoming a Much Bigger Analytical Challenge</h4>PFAS analysis has rapidly evolved from a specialized environmental testing problem into a much broader challenge involving drinking water, food, packaging, laboratory contamination, international regulation, data analysis, and even destruction technologies. In an interview with Michelle Taylor, Editor-in-Chief of Labcompare, the discussion explored what laboratories are learning from the latest PFAS research—and why the analytical demands are likely to continue growing.Taylor leads editorial content for Labcompare, an online resource covering analytical laboratory instrumentation, products, and scientific developments. Among the projects she considers particularly important are two long-form documentaries produced by Labcompare examining per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), first through drinking water and subsequently through food.The documentaries brought together subject-matter experts working across PFAS analysis and exposed some of the practical realities laboratories now face: rapidly changing regulations, extremely low detection limits, complex matrices, contamination risks, and sample volumes that can overwhelm laboratory capacity.<h4>From drinking water to seafood</h4>One of the most memorable findings for Taylor came during production of the second documentary, which focused on PFAS in food.Several experts interviewed for the project told her they had stopped eating seafood, in some cases many years earlier, because of concerns surrounding contamination. For Taylor, the consistency and immediacy of those responses illustrated how closely analytical research can intersect with everyday decisions.Seafood also demonstrates why PFAS testing can become analytically difficult.Fish and other high-lipid samples require effective extraction to release the analytes, followed by rigorous cleanup to remove fats. According to the experts Taylor interviewed, the cleanup step is particularly critical because residual lipids can damage LC columns and create severe matrix interferences.Laboratories are therefore using approaches such as enhanced matrix removal and carbon- or silica-based sorbents to reduce the lipid content of extracts before instrumental analysis. The goal is not simply obtaining sufficient recovery, but producing an extract clean enough to maintain analytical performance and laboratory throughput.<h4>How laboratories are handling the PFAS sample burden</h4>The analytical sensitivity now required for PFAS testing presents another challenge: laboratories may need to measure compounds at parts-per-trillion levels while processing growing numbers of samples.Automation has therefore become increasingly important, particularly during sample preparation, where repetitive manual procedures can otherwise create a major bottleneck.Taylor also described a tiered analytical strategy being used by some laboratories. A less demanding measurement can first be used for screening, while samples generating a positive result are subsequently transferred to a more sensitive platform, such as triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry, for confirmation and quantitation.This type of workflow can help laboratories concentrate their highest-performance instrumentation on the samples that actually require it rather than applying the most intensive analysis to every incoming sample.The broader principle is likely to become increasingly important as PFAS testing expands: laboratories must find ways to increase throughput without sacrificing the sensitivity demanded by regulatory methods.<h4>When the laboratory itself becomes a source of PFAS</h4>At trace concentrations, contamination introduced during sample preparation or measurement can become comparable to the concentration being determined.This makes the materials used throughout the analytical workflow particularly important.Taylor emphasized that PFAS laboratories must maintain continuous awareness of potential contamination from solvents, water, tubing, containers, and other laboratory components. Equipment containing fluoropolymers such as PTFE may be problematic in certain PFAS workflows because background contamination can contribute to false positives or elevated blanks.As detection limits move lower, dedicated PFAS-compatible or fluoropolymer-free laboratory equipment becomes increasingly valuable.Taylor described manufacturers offering clearly identified PFAS-free configurations as an important response to this problem. Rather than forcing laboratories to investigate the material composition of each component individually, dedicated configurations can simplify method implementation and reduce uncertainty about potential background sources.For laboratories already dealing with demanding workflows and large sample loads, eliminating potential contamination before it occurs can save considerable troubleshooting time.<h4>Food packaging could drive the next major wave of testing</h4>PFAS concerns are not limited to the food itself.The interview also examined food-contact materials, including takeout containers and other packaging from which PFAS may migrate into food. State-level restrictions in the United States are already beginning to affect the materials manufacturers can use.For contract laboratories, this creates the possibility of another significant increase in demand for compliance and migration testing.Taylor’s recommendation is straightforward: laboratories should follow proposed regulations before they become final.Waiting until a new requirement takes effect can leave a laboratory simultaneously trying to acquire instrumentation, establish methods, train staff, and respond to customer demand. Monitoring regulatory agencies, scientific meetings, and industry discussions earlier gives laboratories time to prepare analytical capabilities before the testing requirement becomes urgent.She expects PFAS restrictions in food packaging to continue developing first through a patchwork of individual state regulations. Once a sufficient number of states adopt restrictions, however, the economics may increasingly encourage suppliers to move toward PFAS-free materials regardless of whether every jurisdiction requires them.A national standard could eventually follow that transition.<h4>One sample, two regulatory environments</h4>International food exporters face another complication: PFAS requirements are not necessarily the same between the United States and European Union.Taylor noted that laboratories serving both markets may effectively need to operate under a dual-compliance model.In the interview, she highlighted EU requirements targeting specific PFAS—including PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, and PFHxS—at very low concentrations in certain foods, while the U.S. approach has historically involved a different combination of monitoring programs, evolving compound lists, and import-related requirements.For laboratories supporting international customers, this means more than simply selecting a different reporting limit.Different markets may require different target lists, methods, documentation, auditing, and compliance procedures. Laboratories therefore need analytical platforms capable of ultratrace measurements while also maintaining the operational flexibility to support multiple regulatory frameworks.That additional complexity also carries a practical cost: performing different protocols for different jurisdictions means more staff time, additional workflow management, and potentially greater instrument demand.<h4>Total fluorine screening can help laboratories decide what to analyze next</h4>Targeted LC-MS/MS methods are highly sensitive, but they only measure compounds included in the analytical panel.This creates an important question: what about fluorinated substances that are present but are not included in the targeted method?The interview discussed EPA Method 1621, which uses a broader fluorine-based screening approach. Taylor described this type of measurement as useful for helping laboratories assess the gap between compounds captured by targeted LC-MS/MS methods and the broader amount of organofluorine present in a sample.Such screening can also become part of a tiered workflow.For applications such as food packaging, laboratories could initially use a broader fluorine measurement to determine whether a sample warrants further investigation. Positive or suspicious samples could then move to more selective and sensitive targeted analysis for identification and quantitation.Non-targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry can add another layer by revealing compounds outside conventional target lists.Together, these approaches create a funnel from broad screening toward increasingly detailed characterization rather than attempting the most comprehensive analysis on every sample from the outset.<h4>PFAS analysis is becoming a data problem too</h4>High-resolution mass spectrometry can generate enormous datasets containing signals from large numbers of known and unknown compounds.As a result, Taylor believes the role of the analytical chemist is changing.Strong laboratory skills remain essential, but scientists increasingly need data literacy as well. Understanding complex datasets, working with advanced software, and interacting effectively with artificial intelligence and machine-learning tools are becoming important parts of modern analytical work.Taylor does not see this change primarily as replacing scientific expertise.Instead, she compares it with earlier laboratory automation: repetitive or technically demanding tasks can increasingly be handled by software, allowing scientists to spend more time interpreting results and making decisions.AI may also make sophisticated analytical information more accessible. A less experienced mass spectrometry user could potentially receive explanations of complex data through software capable of presenting results in natural language, reducing dependence on a single specialist being immediately available.There is another potential advantage beyond speed.Machine-learning systems can recognize patterns across large datasets that may be difficult or impossible for an individual scientist to detect manually. As analytical datasets become larger and multidimensional, that pattern-recognition capability could become increasingly valuable.<h4>Finding PFAS is only the first half of the problem</h4>For years, much of the PFAS discussion has focused on answering two questions:<ul><li>Are PFAS present, and how much is there?</li></ul>The next challenge is considerably harder: how do we actually remove or destroy them?Taylor described this as an expanding research field that will increasingly involve analytical laboratories.The strength of the carbon-fluorine bond makes PFAS destruction difficult. Some treatment approaches seek to break this bond and achieve complete defluorination, but incomplete destruction can create another analytical problem.For example, thermal treatment may transform longer-chain PFAS into shorter-chain fluorinated compounds rather than eliminating them completely. Those products may then enter another environmental compartment, including atmospheric emissions.Consequently, laboratories studying PFAS destruction must do more than measure disappearance of the original compound. They also need to determine whether fluorinated transformation products or other byproducts remain.Analytical chemistry therefore has two roles: monitoring PFAS contamination and demonstrating whether remediation technologies truly destroy the substances they are intended to remove.<h4>The PFAS problem is expanding beyond water and food</h4>The first two Labcompare documentaries focused primarily on water and food, two matrices already receiving substantial regulatory and public attention.But Taylor does not expect the story to end there.If Labcompare produces another PFAS documentary, she sees PFAS in air as a likely subject. Discussions with experts during earlier filming repeatedly raised atmospheric contamination, including both direct environmental occurrence and emissions potentially associated with treatment or destruction processes.The progression illustrates how quickly the PFAS field is expanding.Drinking water regulation accelerated analytical development. Food testing introduced more difficult matrices and new exposure pathways. Packaging is creating another compliance challenge. Environmental remediation raises questions about destruction products. Atmospheric monitoring could become another significant frontier.For laboratories already working with chromatography and mass spectrometry, Taylor’s message is essentially to be prepared—even organizations that do not currently consider themselves “PFAS laboratories” may eventually become involved.<h4>An analytical field that is still changing rapidly</h4>Perhaps the strongest theme running through the interview is that PFAS analysis has no fixed endpoint yet.Methods continue to evolve. Regulations change. Target compound lists expand. Instrument sensitivity improves. Laboratories discover new sources of background contamination, while researchers identify additional exposure pathways and investigate new destruction technologies.Taylor compares the situation to earlier periods of rapid analytical development, such as the evolution of forensic DNA analysis: each technological advance reveals more information, which in turn creates new questions and new analytical requirements.That makes preparation particularly important.Laboratories cannot predict every future regulation, but they can follow proposed requirements, develop flexible workflows, invest in contamination control and data capabilities, and understand how their existing chromatography and mass spectrometry expertise could be applied to emerging PFAS challenges.The analytical problem is no longer simply detecting a group of “forever chemicals.”It is becoming a much larger question of how we identify them, quantify them, prevent contamination during analysis, understand their movement through food and the environment, comply with evolving regulations, and ultimately prove that they have actually been destroyed.<blockquote>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</blockquote><blockquote><h4>Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast</h4>Dive into the frontiers of chromatography, mass spectrometry, and sample preparation with host David Oliva. Each episode features candid conversations with leading researchers, industry innovators, and passionate scientists who are shaping the future of analytical chemistry. From decoding PFAS detection challenges to exploring the latest in AI-assisted liquid chromatography, this show uncovers practical workflows, sustainability breakthroughs, and the real-world impact of separation science. Whether you’re a chromatographer, lab professional, or researcher you'll discover inspiring content!You can find Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast in podcast apps:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1wZg67rCjoGju4yhqxI3tL">Spotify</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podcasts.apple.com/tz/podcast/concentrating-on-chromatography/id1788429185">Apple podcast</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podscan.fm/podcasts/concentrating-on-chromatography">podscan</a></li></ul>and on <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.youtube.com/@ChromatographyTalk/videos">YouTube channel</a></blockquote>

PFAS in Water, Food & Packaging: Michelle Taylor on the "Forever Chemicals" Documentary Series

Article

Scientists

Environment

Food

Water

Interview

Science and research

Video

Since its establishment in 2011, CEITEC has quickly developed into a cutting-edge infrastructure for research which performs highly alongside the best institutes in Europe. Among the main priorities of CEITEC are the promotion of a motivating and dynamic international scientific environment, the provision of state-of-the-art research infrastructure, and the policy of open communication and equal opportunities.

CEITEC

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

Organomation 80 Position MULTIVAP Nitrogen Evaporator

The 80 position MULTIVAP parallel evaporator is a high temperature dry block model. This instrument contains a rectangular gas distribution system mounted on a frame and dual post assembly. 

The 80 position MULTIVAP parallel evaporator is a high temperature dry block model. This instrument contains a rectangular gas distribution system mounted on a frame and dual post assembly. The manifold delivers nitrogen gas to the needles or glass pipettes, which direct the gas onto the sample’s surface. This method results in rapid solvent evaporation and sample concentration. In order to conserve nitrogen gas, the manifold has a toggle switch for every row of 8 samples, which allows individual rows to be shut off when evaporating batches of less than 80 samples. Nitrogen gas flow is also controlled by an adjustable flow meter and a built-in pressure regulator.The 80 position MULTIVAP small vial evaporator uses a heated aluminum dry block to reach evaporative temperatures ranging from 30°C to 120°C. An unheated version is available for evaporations that will be performed at ambient temperatures. Sample blocks are customized, within a range of 10-17 mm, for the user’s sample size for maximum and even heat transfer.Since the heat block is made-to-order, we will request that you deliver us three sample vials for each unique vial size upon placing an order for a 30, 48 or 80 Position MULTIVAP. In situations where shipping sample vials to Organomation is not possible, we need precise measurements of your sample vials to be taken.All models can withstand contact with organic solvents; however acid resistant models are also available for use with corrosive solutions.<ul><li>Capacity: Evaporate batches of up to 80 samples at once, with outside diameters of up to 17 mm</li><li>Precise: Digital controls allow exact temperature regulation</li><li>Cost-Effective: Conserve gas by using ON/OFF valve for rows not in use</li><li>Consistent: Uniform evaporation across all samples with no adjustment needed between runs</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_80_Position_MULTIVAP_Nitrogen_Evaporator_2_8d7053713b.jpg" alt="Organomation 80 Position MULTIVAP Nitrogen Evaporator." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_80_Position_MULTIVAP_Nitrogen_Evaporator_2_8d7053713b.jpg 156w," sizes="100vw" width="1400" height="1400"><h3>STANDARD FEATURES</h3><ul><li>Adjustable flow meter, 0-25 lpm</li><li>Dual band hoist spring assembly</li><li>High temperature limit switch for safety</li><li>Safety control cover plate</li><li>Digital temperature controller</li><li>Electronic timer</li><li>Nitrogen filter</li><li>Gas distribution manifold</li><li>Built-in pressure reducing regulator</li><li>Needle guide</li></ul><h3>OPTIONS&nbsp;</h3><ul><li>220v wiring harness (Option Code# -2), Cat# 11880-2</li><li>Z-Purge/positive pressure purge case (Option Code# -Z), Cat# 11880-Z</li><li>Acid resistant coating on instrument and needles (Option Code# -RT), Cat# 11880-RT</li><li>Pasteur pipette adapters in place of needles (Option Code -P), Cat# 11880-P</li><li>Manifold and stand only: no heating platform (Option Code -O), Cat# 11880-O</li></ul><h3>SPECS</h3><h4>80 Position MULTIVAP (Dry Block)</h4><ul><li>Heater Type: Dry Block</li><li>Instrumental Catalog Number: 11880</li><li>Number of Sample Positions: 80</li><li>Overall Dimension (w × d × h): 16 × 14 × 30 in / 41 × 36 × 76 cm</li><li>Sample Holder Layout: Rectangular</li><li>Gas Manifold Layout: 8 × 10 Array</li><li>Center to Center Spacing Between Positions: 0.8 in / 2.03 cm</li><li>Test Tube Diameter: 10–17 mm OD</li><li>Gas Flow Control On/Off Valve: Every row of 8</li><li>Stainless Steel Needles (Length × Gauge): 4.0 in × 19 ga / 102 mm × 19 ga</li><li>Needle Guide: Standard</li><li>Hoist Assembly: Dual Pulley &amp; Band Springs</li><li>Integrated Control Box with Timer for Nitrogen &amp; Heat: Standard</li><li>Built-in Gas Regulator Input: 30–110 psig</li><li>Acid Resistant Coating (Option Code -RT): Optional</li></ul><h5>OA-SYS Heating Device Specifications</h5><ul><li>Model Number: 9156</li><li>Outside Dimensions: 16 × 14 × 6.5 in / 41 × 36 × 15 cm</li><li>Total Wattage: 900 W</li><li>Temperature Range: 30–120 °C</li><li>Temperature Controller Type: Digital Electronic with LED Display</li><li>Controller Accuracy: ±2 °C</li></ul><h4>80 Position MULTIVAP (No Heater)</h4><ul><li>Heater Type: None</li><li>Instrumental Catalog Number: 11880-O</li><li>Number of Sample Positions: 80</li><li>Overall Dimension (w × d × h): 13 × 15 × 26 in / 33 × 38 × 66 cm</li><li>Sample Holder Layout: Rectangular</li><li>Gas Manifold Layout: 8 × 10 Array</li><li>Center to Center Spacing Between Positions: 0.8 in / 2.03 cm</li><li>Test Tube Diameter: 10–17 mm OD</li><li>Gas Flow Control On/Off Valve: Every row of 8</li><li>Stainless Steel Needles (Length × Gauge): 4.0 in × 19 ga / 102 mm × 19 ga</li><li>Needle Guide: Standard</li><li>Hoist Assembly: Dual Pulley &amp; Band Springs</li><li>Integrated Control Box with Timer for Nitrogen &amp; Heat: N/A</li><li>Built-in Gas Regulator Input: 30–110 psig</li><li>Acid Resistant Coating (Option Code -RT): Optional</li></ul><h3>ACCESSORIES</h3><ul><li>Custom sized inserts (cat# NA1881, cat# NA1882)</li><li>Pasteur pipette adapters (cat# NA0636, cannot be used with needle guide)</li><li>Luer plugs (cat# NA1307)</li><li>Pressure reducing regulator 0-160 psi (cat# NA0630)</li><li>Various needle sizes and gauges</li></ul>

Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-XY Automation for XRF

The Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-XY XRF system enables unattended operation, sample prep and analysis with high quality, efficiency, and reduced cost.

<div><div><h4>Increase your capacity to handle more samples in less time.&nbsp;</h4>The Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-XY Automation for XRF permits continuous and unattended operation of<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products?instrumentationItems=100&amp;manufacturerItems=3&amp;search=9900"> Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ 9900 series X-ray Spectrometers</a>. Increased automation brings:&nbsp;<ul><li>Higher analysis quality</li><li>Lower analysis costs</li><li>Sustainable analysis cadence with predictable and reproducible response times</li><li>Short payback period</li></ul><h3>Automated Sample Handling</h3>The Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ OEM-XY automated sample loader allows connecting the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1211">ARL™ PERFORM'X</a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products?instrumentationItems=100&amp;manufacturerItems=3&amp;search=9900">ARL™ 9900</a> series to fully automatic preparation machines. Key features:<ul><li>Prepared samples (usually pressed pellets) are transported via belt conveyor from press to spectrometer</li><li>Unattended operation is ensured by engineering software supervision</li><li>Suitable for cement, metallurgy, and mining applications</li></ul></div><div><h3>Complete Automation with ARL SMS Software</h3>The ARL SMS software provides full automation of Thermo Scientific™ XRF spectrometers for routine production control, including sample preparation and analysis.<h3>Key Benefits:</h3><ul><li>Regular analysis of control samples with SPC evaluation for anomaly detection</li><li>Online connectivity for automatic sample preparation</li><li>Supports up to two sample transfer systems</li><li>Allows manual or online registration of externally prepared samples</li><li>Available as turnkey solution in ARL™ QuantoShelter cabin for production floor deployment</li><li>Seamless integration into quality control and production processes</li><li>Automatic result transmission after analysis</li></ul><h3>Compatible Sample Types:</h3><ul><li>Metallic samples (ferrous and non-ferrous)</li><li>Oxides from metal production (ores, sinters, baths, slags, blast furnace slags)</li><li>Oxides from minerals and cement</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_XY_Automation_for_XRF_2_8bce1d83a2.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-XY Automation for XRF" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_XY_Automation_for_XRF_2_8bce1d83a2.jpg 179w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="569"></div></div>

Thermo Scientific ARL SMS-Omega XRF Instrument

Boost production efficiency with fully automated XRF analysis. The ARL OPTIM'X with SMS-Omega ensures high-quality results with unattended prep, rapid WDXRF, and compact design.

Keep up with production demands with automated XRF analysis. When different types of material have to be processed in parallel, the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1212">Thermo Scientific™ ARL OPTIM'X™ WDXRF Spectrometer</a> with the Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-Omega XRF Instrument is the solution. Automatic sample preparation and handling without user intervention, combined with rapid analysis, provide high-quality results. This innovative solution has a compact footprint of less than 1 m², so it can be installed in centralized laboratories or on production shop floors, wherever fully automated industrial production control is needed.This cost-effective system is a unique combination of Thermo Scientific XRF and automation technology for fully automated sample preparation and analysis of one material type.<h3>Main Features</h3><ul><li>Unattended instrument monitoring and integrated audit trail functions</li><li>Sample handling arm equipped with a suction device (metals version) or a gripper (oxide version) loads samples for analysis.</li><li>Samples processed under strict identical and reproducible conditions</li><li>Fixed circular magazine</li><li>XRF functionality provided by the flexible and compact <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1212">Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ OPTIM'X WDXRF </a>Instrument</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_Omega_XRF_Instrument_2_ee38dccfef.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-Omega XRF Instrument " srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_Omega_XRF_Instrument_2_ee38dccfef.jpg 233w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="435"><h3>Features of the OPTIM'X WDXRF Instrument</h3><ul><li>WDXRF platform with sequential and/or simultaneous capabilities</li><li>Configurable to cover all elements from fluorine (F) to uranium (U) in sequential mode</li><li>Fast analysis of solids, liquids and loose powders with superior spectral resolution</li><li>No water cooling or gas supply required (depending on configuration)</li><li>Closely coupled optics for increased intensity (50% higher than conventional geometry)</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_OPTIM_X_WDXRF_Spectrometer_b264a3a303.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ OPTIM'X WDXRF Spectrometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_OPTIM_X_WDXRF_Spectrometer_b264a3a303.jpg 94w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="1077"><h3>Features of the Fixed Circular Magazine</h3><ul><li>Eight positions for storing reference standards</li><li>Allows occasional manual introduction of prepared samples</li><li>One additional position dedicated to filing production samples following analysis</li><li>The complete system can also be supplied within a Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ QuantoShelter container for in situ analysis closer to the process.</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_Omega_XRF_Instrument_87d53e64fb.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-Omega XRF Instrument" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_Omega_XRF_Instrument_87d53e64fb.jpg 216w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="471">

Thermo Scientific ARL SMS-2300 Robotics-Based Automation for OES or XRF

Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-2300 enables fast, reproducible, and unattended OES/XRF analysis to optimize steel production and meet the strictest quality standards.

<h4>Meet stringent steel specifications while increasing efficiency and lowering production costs.</h4>The Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-2300 Robotics-Based Automation for OES or XRF is an automated quality control solution to optimize your steel production operation. With the high-performance ARL SMS-2300 system, even complex samples are prepared and analyzed under reproducible conditions without operator intervention, eliminating human variables and subjective factors. 👉 Result: Increased output, reliable results, and reduced costs.<h3>🔧 ARL SMS-2300 Automation for OES or XRF</h3>Provides ultimate power and flexibility for automatic, unattended 24/7 operation of:<ul><li>ARL™ 4460</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1213">ARL™ iSpark</a> / <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1977">iSpark Plus OES</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products?instrumentationItems=100&amp;manufacturerItems=3&amp;search=9900">ARL™ 9900 XRF</a></li></ul><h3>✅ Main Features</h3><ul><li>Easy integration into fully automatic laboratories</li><li>Installed in ARL QuantoShelter, close to production process</li><li>Parallel tasking:<ul><li>Sample preparation</li><li>Sample introduction</li><li>Analysis</li><li>Instrument stand cleaning performed in hidden time</li></ul></li><li>High throughput with:<ul><li>Automatic sample preparation</li><li>Haas Mini Mill + ARL™ PrepControl™ + EasyPrep™ software</li></ul></li><li>Direct access to Haas Mini Mill for faster ferrous sample processing</li><li>Factory-configured and customized</li><li>Compact chassis, simple installation, and integrated electronics</li><li>High reliability, rapid ROI, and fast result availability</li><li>Frees lab personnel from routine tasks</li><li>ISO 9001 compliant manufacturing and maintenance</li></ul><h3>🚀 Advanced Technology</h3><ul><li>Fanuc industrial robot</li><li>OXSAS analytical software</li></ul>

Thermo Scientific ARL SMS-3300 Automation for Single or Twin OES or XRF

Thermo Scientific™ ARL SMS-3300 enables fully automated operation of one or two OES or XRF spectrometers, enhancing lab efficiency in industrial environments.

Drive process control laboratory efficiencies in the metals, mining and cement industries with the Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-3300 Automation for Single or Twin OES or XRF, a complete laboratory workflow automation solution. The automation of single or multiple spectrometers and preparation machines with the ARL SMS-3300 system offers:👉 Reduced sample analysis cost, 👉 Increased sample throughput, 👉 Better reproducibility, and 👉 Higher quality resultsfor users requiring more comprehensive and integrated automation solutions in the metals, mining and cement industries.<h3>🔧 ARL SMS-3300 – Automation for Single or Twin OES or XRF</h3>Provides ultimate power and flexibility for automatic, unattended, 24/7 operation of:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1213">Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ iSpark </a>/<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1977"> iSpark Plus </a>(Optical Emission Spectrometers)</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products?instrumentationItems=100&amp;manufacturerItems=3&amp;search=9900">Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ 9900</a> (X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer)</li></ul><h3>✅ Main Features</h3><ul><li>Designed for easy integration into fully automatic laboratories</li><li>Can be mounted in Thermo Scientific ARL QuantoShelter, close to the production process</li><li>Parallel task execution:<ul><li>Sample preparation</li><li>Sample introduction</li><li>Analysis</li><li>Instrument stand cleaning performed in hidden time by the spectrometer, independently of the robot</li></ul></li><li>Direct access to milling machine for reduced processing times of ferrous samples</li><li>Higher throughput with:<ul><li>Automatic sample preparation</li><li>ARL™ PrepControl™ system + ARL™ EasyPrep™ software</li></ul></li><li>Factory configured and customized</li><li>Compact chassis and simple installation</li><li>Integrated electronics</li><li>Improved analysis reliability and quality</li><li>Very rapid payback</li><li>Faster result availability</li><li>Qualified lab personnel freed from routine tasks</li><li>Manufactured and maintained according to ISO 9001-2000 procedures</li></ul><h3>🚀 Advanced Technology</h3><ul><li>State-of-the-art Fanuc industrial robot</li><li>OXSAS analytical software</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_3300_Automation_for_Single_or_Twin_OES_or_XRF_fadcbb621a.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL SMS-3300 Automation for Single or Twin OES or XRF" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_3300_Automation_for_Single_or_Twin_OES_or_XRF_fadcbb621a.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="366">

Thermo Scientific ARL SMS-3500 Automation for Twin OES or XRF

The ARL SMS-3500 automates two OES or XRF spectrometers with smart sample flow management for fast, efficient, and continuous production control.

Drive process control laboratory efficiencies in the metals and mining industries with the Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-3500 Automation for Twin OES or XRF, a complete laboratory workflow automation solution. Primary metals producers' laboratories typically run two fully duplicate and separate spectrometry lines to assure fast response times when several urgent samples must be processed simultaneously. 👉 The ARL SMS-3500 system is an affordable alternative.The automation of multiple spectrometers and preparation machines with the ARL SMS-3500 system offers:<ul><li>Reduced sample analysis cost</li><li>Increased sample throughput</li><li>Better reproducibility</li><li>Higher quality results</li></ul>for users requiring more comprehensive and integrated automation solutions in the metals and mining industries.The ARL SMS-3500 Automation for Twin OES or XRF simplifies sample handling by providing:<ul><li>a single introduction location for all samples</li><li>a magazine storage function to free the introduction 👉 This reduces response times, increases sample processing cadence, and improves the availability of automatic sample preparation in highly critical production control environments.</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_3500_Automation_for_Twin_OES_or_XRF_2_0553f2880b.jpg" alt="Thermo Scientific™ ARL™ SMS-3500 Automation for Twin OES or XRF - 2.jpg" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Thermo_Scientific_ARL_SMS_3500_Automation_for_Twin_OES_or_XRF_2_0553f2880b.jpg 217w," sizes="100vw" width="650" height="469"><h3>✅ Main Features</h3><ul><li>No need for time-consuming electro-mechanical transfer systems – the SMS-3500 robot moves samples between components within seconds</li><li>Simplified operation and reduced system complexity for easier maintenance and servicing</li><li>Single interface screen for all sample tracking and automation functions</li><li>Unified registration and introduction point for all production samples, with automated routing to the appropriate system components</li><li>Support for two sample preparation machines:<ul><li>Reduces response times</li><li>Increases processing cadence</li><li>Improves automatic sample preparation availability</li></ul></li><li>Operator workload is reduced – the system manages samples by priority and availability of resources<ul><li>Includes internal sample storage to free the introduction point immediately</li></ul></li><li>Each instrument can be used offline for manual tasks without interrupting automated operation</li><li>Uses the same analytical software for XRF and OES</li><li>Automation is based on proven ARL SMS software</li></ul><h3>🔧 Recommended for:</h3><ul><li>Iron and steel applications</li><li>High alloy, stainless steel, copper, brass, and bronze applications</li><li>Aluminum or fire assay applications</li></ul>

Thermo Scientific AnStat-330 Online Sampling and Elemental Analysis Station

The AnStat-330 provides real-time elemental analysis of slurries, improving metal recovery and eliminating delays and the need for sampling pumps.

The Thermo Scientific™ AnStat-330 Online Sampling and Elemental Analysis Station is a high availability, low head loss solution for:<ul><li>Metallurgical accounting</li><li>High-quality measurement of critical slurry streams in mineral processing plants</li></ul>It features an integrated analyzer and a full-flow, multistage, representative sampler, delivering:<ul><li>Accurate real-time assays</li><li>Enhanced control of flotation circuits, including:<ul><li>Flotation plant feed</li><li>Roughing and cleaning circuits</li><li>Final concentrates and tailings</li></ul></li></ul><h3>🔧 Key Advantages</h3><ul><li>Eliminates:<ul><li>Costly and unreliable sample transport systems</li><li>Measurement lag from cycle time delays and cross-contamination common with centralized analyzers</li></ul></li><li>Delivers:<ul><li>Reliable and rapid response to process upsets and feed fluctuations</li><li>Low head loss design, removing the need for sample pumps</li><li>Simplified flotation plant layout and installation</li></ul></li></ul><h3>⚙️ Operational Benefits</h3>Use the AnStat-330 to:<ul><li>Improve processing efficiency</li><li>Reduce life-of-mine OPEX for sampling and analysis</li><li>Lower energy consumption</li><li>Optimize reagent use</li><li>Improve metal recovery</li><li>Maximize Net Smelter Return (NSR)</li></ul><h3>📌 Key Features</h3><ul><li>Real-time elemental analysis and composite sampling for effective process control and metallurgical accounting</li><li>Very low head loss for simplified plant design – no sample pumps required</li><li>Advanced EDXRF detector (Ca to U), with Peltier cooling for stable, reliable operation in harsh environments</li><li>Versatile, compact system – easy to integrate into existing plants</li><li>24/7 high availability for both analysis and sampling</li><li>Multistage proportional sampling, including final-stage hardened cross-cut sampler for representative samples</li><li>Low maintenance – only moving parts in final-stage cross-cut sampler</li><li>Final-stage sampler identical for both AnStat-330 and SamStat-30 across full flow range</li></ul><h3>🧩 Optional Features</h3><ul><li>Pebble screen: Removes oversized particles from cyclone overflow; acts as backup to upstream primary screen</li><li>Outlet distributor: Splits slurry flow into 2+ streams with defined volume ratios</li><li>Upwelling/reverse flow sampling zone: Ideal for particle size analysis (with PSM-500)</li><li>Vacuum filter: For use with composite sampling</li></ul>

EST Analytical FLEX 2 Robotic Sampling Platform

The FLEX 2 autosampler streamlines GC/GC-MS workflows with liquid, headspace, and SPME capability, MTX tool change, and Prep Ahead for faster, more reliable VOC analysis.

The FLEX 2 is a versatile GC autosampler designed to handle both sample preparation and sample introduction for GC and GC/MS analysis. Supporting liquid injection, headspace, and SPME, it delivers exceptional accuracy and reproducibility. Its Prep Ahead function improves efficiency by allowing sample preparation during ongoing GC runs, maximizing system utilization and throughput.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/EST_Analytical_FLEX_2_Robotic_Sampling_Platform_3_853e02f151.jpg" alt="EST Analytical: FLEX 2 Robotic Sampling Platform" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_EST_Analytical_FLEX_2_Robotic_Sampling_Platform_3_853e02f151.jpg 168w," sizes="100vw" width="628" height="584"><h4>Key Features</h4><h5>Flexible Sample Preparation with Multi Tool Change (MTX)</h5><ul><li>Automated Multi Tool Change (MTX) enables seamless switching between tools</li><li>Enhances laboratory productivity, accuracy, and safety by reducing manual prep errors</li><li>Supports dilution, reagent addition, and internal standard spiking with precision</li><li>Can operate as a benchtop preparation station for derivatization and extraction steps</li></ul><h5>Liquid Injection Capabilities</h5><ul><li>Injection range: 0.5–10 μL (standard syringe) or 50–500 μL (optional large-volume syringe)</li><li>Supports both standard and large-volume injections (up to 500 μL)</li><li>Programmable injection speed control, from ultra-fast to very slow</li><li>Optional cooled trays available for temperature-sensitive samples</li></ul><h5>Headspace Sampling</h5><ul><li>Injection range: 100–2500 μL (2.5 mL syringe), 100–1000 μL (1.0 mL syringe), or 500–5000 μL (5.0 mL syringe)</li><li>Offers both orbital and oscillating agitation to improve sample consistency</li><li>Six heated vial positions for 2, 10, or 20 mL vials</li><li>Temperature range: ambient to 200 °C</li><li>Shaking: orbital (120–750 rpm) or oscillation (190 Hz)</li></ul><h5>Automated SPME</h5><ul><li>Compatible with both traditional and direct immersion SPME methods</li><li>Heated conditioning station:<ul><li>Fiber: ambient to 350 °C</li><li>Needle: ambient to 150 °C</li><li>Sweep gas port for conditioning</li></ul></li><li>Heated mixing station: ambient to 150 °C, mixing speeds 380–725 rpm</li></ul><h5>Efficiency &amp; Throughput</h5><ul><li>Prep Ahead function allows ongoing sample prep during GC runs</li><li>Fully automates switching between liquid injection, headspace, and SPME with MTX</li><li>Reduces manual workload and preparation errors while improving reproducibility</li></ul><h4>Technical Specifications</h4><ul><li>Compatible Systems: GC and GC/MS platforms</li><li>Injection Modes: Liquid (0.5–500 μL), Headspace (100–5000 μL), SPME (traditional &amp; direct immersion)</li><li>Temperature Ranges: Headspace up to 200 °C, SPME fiber up to 350 °C, SPME needle up to 150 °C</li><li>Agitation: Orbital (120–750 rpm) and oscillating (190 Hz)</li><li>Capacity: Six heated vial positions for 2, 10, or 20 mL vials</li><li>Automation: Multi Tool Change (MTX), Prep Ahead function</li></ul>

EST Analytical LGX-50 for Methane in Water

The EST LGX-50 automates RSK-175 dissolved gas testing in water, boosting throughput, ensuring ASTM/EPA compliance, and reducing manual sample preparation errors.

The LGX-50 automates the preparation of water samples for headspace analysis of dissolved gases such as methane, ethane, and ethene. Traditionally, RSK-175 testing has been labor-intensive and time-consuming, requiring manual vial preparation. The LGX-50 eliminates this step, streamlining workflows and ensuring compliance with EPA Method 5035 and ASTM D8028. By automating dissolved gas extraction, laboratories can boost throughput, reduce errors, and deliver more consistent results for shale gas and environmental testing.<h4>Key Features</h4><h5>Maximized Productivity</h5><ul><li>Fully automates RSK-175 sample processing</li><li>ASTM D8028 compliant for dissolved gas testing</li><li>Holds up to 50 samples for high-throughput operation</li><li>Optical sensors prevent vial misplacement and syringe/elevator errors</li><li>Robust XYZ design ensures reliability and consistent performance</li></ul><h5>Simplified Operation</h5><ul><li>Intuitive, user-friendly software designed for quick setup and operation</li><li>Remote access functionality allows labs to monitor sample progress via the server</li><li>Reduces manual preparation steps, increasing accuracy and reproducibility</li></ul><h4>Technical Specifications</h4><ul><li>Compliance: EPA Method 5035, ASTM D8028</li><li>Capacity: Up to 50 samples per batch</li><li>Target Compounds: Methane, ethane, ethene, and other dissolved gases in water</li><li>Automation: XYZ robotic design with optical sensors for error prevention</li><li>Software: Intuitive, remote-access capable interface</li></ul>

Organomation RapidVap N2/48 Nitrogen Evaporator

The RapidVap N₂/48 Nitrogen Evaporation System rapidly concentrates up to 48 samples using nitrogen blowdown, vortex motion, and dry block heating without the need for water baths.

The RapidVap N₂/48 Evaporation System combines nitrogen blowdown, vortex motion, and controlled heat to accelerate evaporation of up to 48 small samples or eight 450 mL samples simultaneously. A stream of nitrogen or dry gas reduces the partial pressure over the liquid, speeding solvent removal, while microprocessor-controlled vortex motion increases surface area and continuously mixes samples for maximum recovery.&nbsp;Nitrogen delivery can be applied to 2, 4, 6, or all 8 clusters of six ports, conserving gas when processing fewer samples. Using a dry block heating method, the RapidVap N₂/48 offers a reliable, low-maintenance alternative to water bath systems and is ideal for applications such as drug development, bioresearch, combinatorial chemistry, environmental testing, forensics, and toxicology.&nbsp;<ul><li>Dry Block: Dry heating system prevents potential contamination source</li><li>Increased Surface Area: Vortex motion increases surface area for faster evaporation</li><li>PTFE-Coated Chamber: Aluminum with PTFE coating for broad range of chemical compatibility</li><li>End-Point Detection: Signal completion of run allows samples to be left unattended while drying to desired end point</li></ul>In partnership with Labconco.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_Rapid_Vap_N2_48_Nitrogen_Evaporator_2_cc454a8f2d.jpg" alt="Organomation RapidVap N2_48 Nitrogen Evaporator" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_Rapid_Vap_N2_48_Nitrogen_Evaporator_2_cc454a8f2d.jpg 234w," sizes="100vw" width="1169" height="783"><h3>STANDARD FEATURES</h3><ul><li>Dry block heating system prevents adding potential contamination source</li><li>Vortex action, heat, and vacuum combine to accelerate evaporation</li><li>PTFE-coated chamber for broad range of chemical compatibility</li><li>Microprocessor-controlled vortex motion increases surface area for faster evaporation</li><li>Signal completion of run allows samples to be left unattended while evaporation to desired end point</li><li>Microprocessor-controlled nitrogen blow down manifold to facilitate liquid to gas phase change</li></ul><h3>REQUIREMENTS (not included)</h3><ul><li>Sample block</li><li>Glassware</li><li>Nitrogen source with flow rate of 3.5 CFM/100 LPM minimu</li><li>Gas pressure regulator</li></ul><h3>OPTIONS</h3><ul><li>RS-232 Link for two-way communication (Cat# LC-7910014)</li></ul><h3>SPECIFICATIONS</h3><ul><li>Instrument: RapidVap N2/48</li><li>Instrument Catalog Number: LC-7910012</li><li>Bath Type: Dry aluminum blocks</li><li>Number of Sample Positions: Up to 48</li><li>Dimensions (w x d x h): 21.7 x 19.0 x 13.5 in</li><li>Weight: Net: 92 lbs. (42 kg)</li><li>Weight: Gross: 100 lbs. (45 kg)</li><li>Sample Layout: Circular</li><li>Lid Material: Glass</li><li>Pressure Regulator: 0–20 psi</li><li>Temperature Range: 0–100 °C</li><li>Warranty: 1 year</li><li>Electrical Requirements: 115V, 60 Hz</li><li>Vortex Motion: Up to 500 RPM</li></ul><h5>Nitrogen Requirements</h5><ul><li>Flow Rate: 3,5 CFM / 100 LPM minimum</li><li>Pressure: 5–10 psi</li></ul><h3>ACCESSORIES</h3><ul><li>PTFE-coated aluminum blocks</li><li>Borosilicate glass tubes</li><li>600 mL tubes with stems</li><li>170 mL tubes with stems</li><li>Flat bottom tubes</li><li>Eight-place stainless steel racks</li><li>Glassware caps</li></ul>

Products from category Sample preparation automation - page 2

Related content

PFAS in Water, Food & Packaging: Michelle Taylor on the "Forever Chemicals" Documentary Series

CEITEC Microrobots Could Speed Up Beer Production and Food Quality Control

The Importance of Detecting Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)