PFAS are among the most persistent environmental contaminants. Explore LC-MS/MS, GC-MS, TOF, and HRMS approaches for PFAS detection, identification, and quantification.

ASTM D8591-24 and EPA OTM-50 define two key GC-MS strategies for volatile PFAS analysis, from material emissions testing to verification of PFAS destruction efficiency.

Discover how regulated drinking water laboratories use GC-MS and LC-MS, rigorous QC protocols, and PFAS-focused workflows to ensure reliable analytical results and protect public health.

GC×GC-HRTOFMS enables fast and reliable screening of PFAS and emerging contaminants in complex consumer goods, combining EI/PCI/NCI and mass defect workflows for confident identification.

Interview with Dr. Eamonn Clark on WRRC water research, fuel-spill impacts, PFAS workflows, and how DIY tools like a homebuilt nitrogen evaporator can expand low-resource labs.

Organomation explains how PFAS-free nitrogen evaporators eliminate fluoropolymer contamination by replacing PTFE tape with a PTFE-free sealant, ensuring safe and reliable PFAS sample preparation.

Prof. David Hanigan explains why PFAS removal isn’t enough, how online FTIR reveals gas-phase products, and where EPA 1633 vs. 533/537 and OTM-45/50 fit in real-world PFAS analysis.

Christopher Freye (LANL) presents non-targeted PFAS analysis using LC-MS, GC×GC-TOFMS, and HRMS. Novel workflows reveal complex PFAS fingerprints in fluoropolymers and explosives.

PFAS, especially TFA, have been detected in wine at increasing concentrations. This blog presents a GC/MS method to detect TFA in wine down to low µg/l levels.

This study evaluates PFAS emissions from firefighter jackets using TD-GC×GC-TOF MS, comparing layers and wear conditions to assess exposure routes and identify discriminating chemical features.