Enhanced PAH Analysis in Crude Palm Oil, Crude Palm Kernel Oil, and Coconut Oil

Significance of the topic

This study addresses the critical need to quantify trace levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in high-fat matrices such as crude palm oil, crude palm kernel oil, and coconut oil. PAHs are lipophilic carcinogens that can accumulate during high-temperature processing and pose health risks. Compliance with stringent regulatory limits (e.g., EU maximum of 2 µg/kg benzo(a)pyrene) requires sensitive, reproducible analytical methods tailored to complex lipid-rich samples.

Objectives and overview of the study

The primary goal was to develop a fast, simple workflow combining enhanced lipid cleanup with direct HPLC-FLD analysis to monitor 16 EPA-regulated PAHs in crude and coconut oils. Key aims included:

• Minimize sample preparation time
• Reduce matrix interferences and HPLC flow-path clogging
• Optimize fluorescence detection wavelength for low-level chrysene quantification
• Demonstrate method performance in three challenging matrices

Methodology and instrumentation

Samples (1 g oil) were melted (for coconut oil), spiked with PAH standards, and subjected to a two-step cleanup: Bond Elut EMR–Lipid extraction followed by EMR–Lipid Polish desiccation. The cleaned extracts were directly injected (100 µL) into a donor-acceptor complex chromatography (DACC) enrichment column. After matrix removal by backflush, analytes were transferred to an Agilent Pursuit PAH analytical column for gradient separation. Detection employed a fluorescence detector with excitation at 260 nm and emission at 380 nm to maximize sensitivity for chrysene.

Equipment used

• Agilent 1260 Infinity II flexible pump and binary pump
• Agilent 1260 Infinity II multisampler
• Agilent 1290 multicolumn thermostat with Quick-Change valve
• Agilent 1260 Infinity II fluorescence detector (Ex 260 nm; Em 380/440/500 nm)
• Agilent ChromSphere Pi DACC enrichment column (3.0×80 mm)
• Agilent Pursuit 200Å PAH analytical column (4.6×250 mm, 5 µm)

Key results and discussion

The optimized workflow achieved baseline-clean chromatograms and resolved 12 of 16 PAHs; low-molecular-weight compounds (naphthalene through fluorene) were not retained in the DACC column and eluted during cleanup. Using 380 nm emission improved signal-to-noise ratios (S/N > 8 at 0.1 ppb) for chrysene, anthracene, pyrene, and phenanthrene. Linearity across 0.1–10 ppb yielded R² > 0.999 for all target analytes. Reproducibility was excellent, with retention time and peak area %RSD typically <1%. Recoveries ranged from 90% to 120% in all three matrices, demonstrating minimal matrix effects.

Benefits and practical applications

• Rapid two-step cleanup reduces lipid interference and analysis time by 50% compared to conventional methods
• Direct injection after EMR–Lipid treatment minimizes solvent consumption and sample handling
• FLD sensitivity at 380 nm enables reliable quantification of regulatory PAHs at sub-ppb levels
• Versatile approach applicable to crude oils, refining monitoring, and QA/QC in food laboratories

Future trends and opportunities

Emerging directions include coupling rapid lipid removal to mass spectrometric detection for nonfluorescent PAHs, automated on-line cleanup systems, expanded applications to other fatty matrices (e.g., fish oils), and miniaturized sample-preparation devices for high-throughput screening. Further method refinement may focus on solvent-free extraction and integration with real-time process monitoring.

Conclusion

The presented method combines EMR–Lipid cleanup with DACC enrichment and HPLC-FLD to deliver a robust, sensitive, and high-throughput solution for PAH analysis in complex oil matrices. Its strong performance—demonstrated by linearity (R² > 0.999), low detection limits, high recoveries, and excellent precision—supports its adoption in regulatory and industrial laboratories.

References

1. Ifegwu OC, Anyakora C. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Part I. Exposure. Adv Clin Chem. 2015;72:277–304.
2. Zhang J, et al. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Antibiotics in Oil-Contaminated Aquaculture Areas. J Hazard Mater. 2022;437.
3. Zelinkova Z, Wenzl T. The Occurrence of 16 EPA PAHs in Food – A Review. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2015;35:248–284.
4. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Food. L119/103, 2023.
5. Naegele E. Analysis of PAHs in Edible Oils by Online Enrichment, Matrix Removal and Fluorescence Detection. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5991-2772EN, 2016.
6. Phuah CW, Choo YM, Ma AN, Chuah CH. Degumming and Bleaching Effect on Selected Constituents of Palm Oil. J Oil Palm Res. 2004;16(2):57–63.