Choosing the correct membrane for a syringe filter is an important step in achieving dependable and reproducible analytical results. Whether you work with nylon, PTFE, hydrophilic PTFE, or cellulose acetate filters, the membrane material directly influences filtration efficiency, sample integrity, and overall method performance. In this article, we explore why membrane selection matters, review the characteristics of common membrane materials, and provide practical guidance for choosing the best option for your application.<h4>Why Are Syringe Filters Important?</h4>Syringe filters are routinely used to remove particulate matter from samples prior to analysis. Unfiltered samples can introduce contaminants into chromatographic systems, leading to clogged columns, increased system backpressure, reduced instrument lifetime, and compromised analytical performance.Selecting an appropriate membrane is therefore essential for developing a robust and reliable HPLC workflow. An ideal membrane effectively removes particles while preserving the original composition of the sample. Since the membrane comes into direct contact with both the analyte and the sample solvent, compatibility must always be carefully considered.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_syringe_filters_f3eaa1381e.webp" alt="KNAUER: Syringe filters" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_syringe_filters_f3eaa1381e.webp 156w," sizes="100vw" width="720" height="720">Let’s examine the key factors involved in choosing the most suitable membrane.<h4>Step 1: Consider the Nature of Your Sample</h4>The first and most important factor is the chemical composition of the sample and the solvents involved. Different membrane materials offer different chemical resistance and sample interaction characteristics.<h5>Nylon Membranes</h5>Nylon is one of the most commonly used membrane materials in HPLC laboratories because of its broad compatibility with aqueous solutions and many organic solvents.Recommended applications:<ul><li>Routine filtration of HPLC samples containing aqueous solvents, organic solvents, or mixed mobile phases.</li><li>Removal of suspended particles prior to chromatographic injection.</li><li>General-purpose laboratory filtration where versatility is required.</li></ul>Avoid using Nylon when:<ul><li>Working with strongly acidic solutions or samples with pH values below 3.</li><li>Filtering protein-containing samples, since proteins can adsorb to the membrane surface and reduce recovery.</li></ul><h5>Cellulose Acetate (CA) Membranes</h5>Cellulose acetate membranes exhibit very low protein binding and are widely used for biological and biochemical applications.Recommended applications:<ul><li>Filtration of biological fluids such as serum, plasma, and cell culture media.</li><li>Applications where protein recovery must be maximized.</li><li>Aqueous laboratory procedures involving enzymes or other sensitive biomolecules.</li></ul>Avoid using CA when:<ul><li>Filtering samples containing organic solvents that may damage the membrane.</li><li>Working under highly acidic or highly alkaline conditions that could degrade the material.</li></ul><h5>Hydrophilic PTFE (hPTFE) Membranes</h5>Hydrophilic PTFE combines the exceptional chemical resistance of PTFE with the ability to process aqueous samples without pre-wetting.Recommended applications:<ul><li>Filtration of both aqueous and organic solutions.</li><li>HPLC sample preparation involving mixed solvent systems.</li><li>Applications requiring compatibility across a broad pH range.</li></ul>Avoid using hPTFE when:<ul><li>Processing highly viscous samples that may rapidly clog the membrane.</li><li>Performing PFAS analysis, where fluorinated materials may introduce unwanted contamination.</li></ul><h5>PTFE Membranes</h5>PTFE membranes provide excellent resistance to aggressive chemicals and are especially suitable for demanding solvent environments.Recommended applications:<ul><li>Samples containing strong acids, strong bases, or aggressive organic solvents.</li><li>Environmental, industrial, and chemical analyses involving non-polar solvents such as hexane, toluene, or acetone.</li><li>Filtration of predominantly organic solvent-based samples.</li></ul>Avoid using PTFE when:<ul><li>Filtering aqueous solutions without first wetting the membrane or using a hydrophilic PTFE alternative.</li><li>Working with protein-rich or highly hydrophilic samples where adsorption or poor wetting may occur.</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_1_4_Nylon_top_left_CA_top_right_h_PTFE_bottom_left_and_PTFE_bottom_right_86a6481d0b.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 1–4 Nylon (top left), CA (top, right), hPTFE (bottom, left), and PTFE (bottom, right)" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_1_4_Nylon_top_left_CA_top_right_h_PTFE_bottom_left_and_PTFE_bottom_right_86a6481d0b.jpg 157w," sizes="100vw" width="1111" height="1107"><h4>Step 2: Select an Appropriate Pore Size</h4>The membrane pore size determines the level of particulate removal and should be selected according to the requirements of the analytical method.Common pore sizes include:<ul><li>0.2 µm – Suitable for removing very fine particles and for sterile filtration. Frequently used in UHPLC and LC-MS workflows.</li><li>0.45 µm – The standard choice for most routine HPLC applications.</li><li>1.0 µm and larger – Often used for coarse filtration or as a pre-filtration step for heavily contaminated samples.</li></ul>Choosing the correct pore size helps protect instrumentation while minimizing unnecessary sample loss.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Fig_1_2_0_22_m_left_and_0_45_m_right_Nylon_Syringe_Filter_48ffc3d777.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Fig. 1–2 0.22 µm (left), and 0.45 µm (right) Nylon Syringe Filter" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Fig_1_2_0_22_m_left_and_0_45_m_right_Nylon_Syringe_Filter_48ffc3d777.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1177" height="573"><h4>Step 3: Verify Chemical Compatibility</h4>Before selecting a membrane, confirm that it is compatible with both the sample matrix and the solvents present. Incompatible materials may swell, degrade, release extractables, or alter the composition of the sample.Consulting a solvent compatibility chart is highly recommended whenever unfamiliar solvents or mixtures are involved.<h4>Step 4: Match the Membrane to the Application</h4>Different analytical applications often benefit from specific membrane types.<h5>HPLC Analysis</h5><ul><li>Nylon and PTFE membranes are among the most frequently used options due to their broad chemical compatibility and excellent filtration performance.</li></ul><h5>Protein and Biomolecule Analysis</h5><ul><li>CA, PVDF, and PES membranes are generally preferred because they exhibit low protein binding and help preserve sample recovery.</li></ul><h5>Microbiological Testing</h5><ul><li>Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes are commonly employed for microbial monitoring and microbiological quality control procedures.</li></ul>Selecting a membrane tailored to the analytical objective can significantly improve data quality and method reliability.<h4>Step 5: Evaluate Product Quality and Certification</h4>Not all syringe filters are manufactured to the same standards. For critical applications, select products that comply with recognized quality systems and certifications such as ISO standards or CE requirements.This becomes particularly important in regulated industries, where traceability, consistency, and documented performance are essential.<h4>Practical Recommendations for Using Syringe Filters</h4>Following good filtration practices can further improve analytical performance.<ul><li>Pre-Wet Hydrophobic Membranes: Hydrophobic materials such as PTFE often require pre-wetting with a compatible organic solvent before filtering aqueous samples.</li><li>Avoid Excessive Pressure: Applying excessive force may rupture the membrane or cause leakage. Luer-lock syringes are recommended to provide secure connections and controlled pressure.</li><li>Use Filters Only Once: Syringe filters are intended for single-use operation. Reusing filters increases the risk of carryover and cross-contamination.</li><li>Dispose of Filters Properly: Used syringe filters should be discarded according to laboratory safety procedures and local waste disposal regulations.</li></ul><h4>Final Thoughts</h4>Selecting the right syringe filter membrane is a key factor in obtaining accurate, reproducible, and reliable analytical results. By considering sample composition, solvent compatibility, pore size, and application requirements, laboratories can choose filtration solutions that protect instruments, preserve sample integrity, and improve overall analytical performance.A carefully selected membrane may seem like a small detail, but it can have a substantial impact on the quality and robustness of your entire analytical workflow.<blockquote>If you want to optimize your HPLC workflow, check out our brand-new <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/2380">SEPAPURE Syringe Filter</a>.</blockquote>

How to Choose the Right Membrane for Your Syringe Filter

<h3>A Practical Guide to Getting the Most from Syringe Filters: Tips, Tricks, and Common Pitfalls</h3>Syringe filters play a crucial role in chromatography and many other laboratory applications by removing particulate matter before analysis. Proper sample filtration helps protect analytical instruments, extends column lifetime, and improves data quality. However, selecting an unsuitable filter—or using one incorrectly—can introduce contamination, reduce filtration efficiency, or even compromise analytical results. The following recommendations will help you avoid common mistakes and ensure reliable filtration every time.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_3_150e8c1c2b.webp" alt="KNAUER: Avoiding Common Syringe Filter Mistakes" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_3_150e8c1c2b.webp 133w," sizes="100vw" width="1276" height="1496"><h4>1. Improper Filter Handling</h4>Using excessive force during filtration or attempting to reuse disposable syringe filters can damage the membrane and increase the risk of sample contamination.<ul><li>Solution: Apply slow, even pressure throughout the filtration process and always dispose of single-use filters after one use. If the flow rate decreases noticeably, replace the filter instead of applying additional force.</li></ul><h4>2. Selecting an Inappropriate Pore Size</h4>Using the wrong pore size may either fail to remove unwanted particles or cause the membrane to clog prematurely, reducing filtration efficiency.<ul><li>Solution: A 0.45 µm membrane is generally suitable for routine particulate removal, while a 0.22 µm membrane is recommended for finer filtration and bacterial removal. Samples with higher viscosity may require a pre-filter to prevent rapid clogging. It is also important to consider the intended analytical technique. For example, 0.22 µm filters are typically preferred for UHPLC and LC-MS applications, whereas 0.45 µm filters are often sufficient for conventional HPLC analyses.</li></ul><h4>3. Choosing the Wrong Membrane Material</h4>Different membrane materials exhibit different chemical resistance. Using an incompatible membrane may lead to degradation of the filter, sample contamination, or complete filtration failure.<ul><li>Solution: Always verify solvent compatibility before filtration. PTFE membranes are an excellent choice for organic solvents, while PES and nylon membranes are better suited to aqueous samples. If compatibility is uncertain, perform a small-scale trial before filtering valuable samples.</li><li>Pro Tip: For additional guidance, see our blog article "How to Choose the Right Membrane for your Syringe Filter", which provides a detailed comparison of membrane materials and their recommended applications.</li></ul><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_2_e47021fb11.jpg" alt="KNAUER Sepapure® Syringe Filters are available with multiple membrane materials, each identified by a dedicated color code for quick and reliable selection." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_2_e47021fb11.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1580" height="902"><h4>4. Ignoring Filter Capacity</h4>Using a filter with insufficient capacity can result in rapid membrane blockage, increasing filtration time and reducing laboratory productivity.<ul><li>Solution: When filtering larger sample volumes, choose high-capacity syringe filters or introduce a pre-filtration step. Never force liquid through a clogged membrane, as doing so may damage the filter and negatively affect sample quality.</li></ul><h4>5. Overlooking Sample Adsorption</h4>Certain membrane materials may adsorb analytes of interest, leading to lower recoveries and potentially affecting quantitative results.<ul><li>Solution: For protein samples or other adsorption-sensitive analytes, select membranes with low binding characteristics, such as nylon or glass fiber, whenever appropriate. Performing a small recovery test before routine analysis can help identify potential analyte losses.</li></ul><h4>6. Failing to Optimize Filtration Performance</h4>Slow filtration is more than just an inconvenience—it often indicates that the filtration conditions are not optimal.<ul><li>Solution: If filtration becomes unusually slow, investigate possible causes such as membrane clogging, excessive sample viscosity, or an unnecessarily small pore size. Depending on the sample, dilution or sequential filtration using progressively finer filters may significantly improve performance.</li></ul><h4>Final Thoughts</h4>Selecting the appropriate syringe filter is a straightforward process, but overlooking small details can have a significant impact on analytical performance. Choosing the correct membrane material, pore size, and filtration strategy helps improve laboratory efficiency, protects chromatography systems and columns, and contributes to accurate, reproducible analytical results.With the right syringe filter and proper filtration technique, you can minimize sample preparation problems and maximize confidence in every analysis.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_4_983a15e289.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Sepapure® Syringe Filter Selection" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Avoiding_Common_Syringe_Filter_Mistakes_4_983a15e289.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1160" height="627">Happy filtering!

Avoiding Common Syringe Filter Mistakes

<h3>What Gives Ginger Its Characteristic Kick?</h3>Fresh ginger is bright, aromatic, and sharply spicy, while dried or heated ginger develops a warmer and more intense character. Behind these sensory differences lies a group of bioactive compounds known as gingerols and shogaols. In this study, HPLC was used to compare their presence in fresh ginger, ginger tea, and several commercially available ginger shots.<h4>Gingerols and Shogaols: The Chemistry Behind Ginger</h4>Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is widely valued both as a food ingredient and for its bioactive constituents. Among these, [6]-gingerol is the predominant and most extensively studied pungent compound in fresh ginger. Smaller amounts of [8]-gingerol and [10]-gingerol are also naturally present.Processing changes this chemical profile. When ginger is heated or dried, gingerols can undergo dehydration and form a related group of compounds known as shogaols. One of these, [6]-shogaol, is associated with strong antioxidant activity and has also been investigated for its anti-inflammatory properties.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Figure_1_Structure_of_6_gingerol_a737949416.png" alt="KNAUER: Figure 1: Structure of [6]-gingerol (drawn with MarvinSketch 6.0.1)" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Figure_1_Structure_of_6_gingerol_a737949416.png 245w," sizes="100vw" width="525" height="170"><h4>Why Is Ginger So Popular?</h4>Ginger is commonly associated with digestive support and is frequently used to help alleviate nausea, including motion sickness and mild gastrointestinal discomfort. Its constituents have also been studied in connection with inflammatory processes, muscle and joint discomfort, and broader physiological effects.The chemical composition of ginger products, however, can vary considerably depending on the raw material, formulation, processing conditions, and extraction method. This makes instrumental analysis useful for examining what different ginger products actually contain.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Figure_2_Ginger_picture_generated_by_Open_AI_50c689581b.png" alt="KNAUER: Figure 2: Ginger picture generated with DALL-E (OpenAI; GPT-4o)" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Figure_2_Ginger_picture_generated_by_Open_AI_50c689581b.png 156w," sizes="100vw" width="454" height="454"><blockquote>“And I had but one penny in the world, thou shouldst have it to buy gingerbread.” – William Shakespeare, Love’s Labour’s Lost</blockquote><h4>Taking a Closer Look at I.N.G.W.E.R.</h4>The study compared several commercial ginger shots with fresh ginger root and ginger tea.The liquid ginger products were first centrifuged and the supernatant removed. The remaining solid material was extracted with methanol/water 50:50 (v/v) and centrifuged again. The resulting extract was passed through a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/all/products/2380">0.22 µm nylon syringe filter</a> before injection into the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/lcms/products?category=39&amp;manufacturerItems=503">HPLC system</a>.Chromatographic separation was performed under reversed-phase conditions using a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/en-us/all/products/1635">KNAUER Eurospher II C18H column</a>:<ul><li>Column dimensions: 150 × 3 mm</li><li>Particle size: 3 µm</li><li>Order number: 15CE185E2G</li><li>Flow rate: 0.8 mL/min</li></ul>The gingerol concentration was not determined quantitatively. Instead, chromatographic signal heights were compared with those obtained from freshly extracted ginger root. Direct comparison between commercial products also needs to take into account that the individual shots contained different proportions of ginger.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Table_1_Percentage_of_ginger_in_shot_samples_according_to_their_list_of_ingredients_1a064c0399.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Table 1 Percentage of ginger in shot samples according to their list of ingredients" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Table_1_Percentage_of_ginger_in_shot_samples_according_to_their_list_of_ingredients_1a064c0399.jpg 210w," sizes="100vw" width="1107" height="820"><h4>Ginger Content of the Tested Shots</h4><h5>Fresh Ginger and Ginger Tea</h5><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_fresh_ginger_root_4d6339e54d.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Left: Chromatogram of fresh ginger root, 5 g sample was extracted with MeOH:H₂O; 1 – [6]-gingerol, 2 – [8]-gingerol, 3 – [10]-gingerol. Right: Chromatogram of YogiTea ginger lemon, tea bag (1.8 g) was extracted with 200 ml hot water; 1 – [6]-gingerol" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_fresh_ginger_root_4d6339e54d.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1537" height="485">Fresh ginger provided the clearest representation of the characteristic gingerols. In contrast, only a small [6]-gingerol signal was observed in the tea extract. One important difference is that the tea was prepared using hot water rather than the methanol/water extraction applied to the other samples.<h5>Classic and Pomegranate Ginger Shots</h5><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_classic_ginger_shot_b9de81bb02.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Left: Chromatogram of classic ginger shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol, 2 - [8]-gingerol, 3 - [6]-shogaol, 4 - [10]-gingerol. Right: Chromatogram of pomegranate ginger shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol, 2 - [8]-gingerol, 3 - [6]-shogaol, 4 - [10]-gingerol" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_classic_ginger_shot_b9de81bb02.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1522" height="475">Both products showed a comparatively rich ginger-derived profile. In addition to [6]-gingerol, the chromatograms contained [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol.Among the commercial products examined, the classic and pomegranate shots showed the strongest [6]-gingerol signals.<h5>Turmeric and Fruit Shots</h5><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_Kurkuma_ginger_shot_b8887746f8.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Left: Chromatogram of Kurkuma ginger shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol. Right: Chromatogram of fruit shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_Kurkuma_ginger_shot_b8887746f8.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1527" height="477">In these two samples, [6]-gingerol was the principal ginger-related compound identified. The fruit shot produced the lowest [6]-gingerol signal of all the tested ginger shots, which is consistent with its comparatively low declared ginger content of 2%.<h5>Vitamin Acai and Pineapple Ginger Shots</h5><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_Vitamin_Acai_shot_459cc69719.jpg" alt="KNAUER: Left: Chromatogram of Vitamin Acai shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol, 2 - [8]-gingerol, 3 - [6]-shogaol, 4 - [10]-gingerol. Right: Chromatogram of pineapple ginger shot, 1 - [6]-gingerol, 2 - [8]-gingerol, 3 - [6]-shogaol, 4 - [10]-gingerol" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_KNAUER_Left_Chromatogram_of_Vitamin_Acai_shot_459cc69719.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1510" height="465">The Vitamin Acai and pineapple products showed a broader profile similar to the classic and pomegranate shots. [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol were detected in both samples.<h4>What Did the HPLC Analysis Reveal?</h4>[6]-Gingerol was detected in every sample analyzed. The freshly extracted ginger root gave the strongest reference response, while among the commercial ginger shots, the classic and pomegranate variants showed the highest [6]-gingerol signals.The fruit shot contained the lowest amount based on relative signal height, while the hot-water ginger tea extract produced only a small gingerol response.A broader range of ginger-derived compounds was observed in the classic, pomegranate, pineapple, and Vitamin Acai shots, where [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol were detected alongside [6]-gingerol.Because the experiment was designed as a comparative rather than quantitative analysis, the results should be interpreted as differences in chromatographic response rather than absolute gingerol concentrations. Nevertheless, the experiment demonstrates how straightforward reversed-phase HPLC can be used to compare the characteristic bioactive compounds present in fresh ginger and processed ginger products.Whether fresh, brewed, or packed into a concentrated shot, ginger clearly offers more analytical complexity than its distinctive spicy taste might suggest.<blockquote><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://labrulez.com/pdf/I_N_G_W_E_R_Analytica_254b7c26e3.pdf">Download application note I.N.G.W.E.R. – Instrumental Analysis of Nutritional Ginger Wellness Extracts here</a></blockquote>

I.N.G.W.E.R. – Instrumental Analysis of Nutritional Ginger Wellness Extracts & Residues

Article

Product

Events

Webinars

Application

Academy

Video

Poster

Scientists

Plastics

Environment

Food

Water

Health

Presentation

Scientific article

Interview

Toxicology

Popularization

Science and research

Software

Covid-19

Career

Laboratories

Various

PFAS 

Zaměření

Type of News

Focus

Based in Berlin, KNAUER is a medium-sized, owner-managed company that has been serving the sciences since 1962. We develop and manufacture scientific instruments of superior quality for liquid chromatography, including: Analytical HPLC/UHPLC, Preparative HPLC, Fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC), Multi-column chromatography/Simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography. High pressure dosing, in-line detection systems, and osmometry are additional business areas.

KNAUER

Thermo Fisher Scientific Mass Spectrometry Users’ Meetings 2026

LECO Training Course GDS900/950 & CDP

Thermo Fisher Scientific Analytical solutions forum

Validated Method for PFAS Testing in Food, Including Meats

Confidence in PFAS Data: Smarter Sample Prep, Contamination Control, Highly Sensitive and Robust MS

From sample to result: advanced sample prep strategies for food and environmental matrices