Small Molecule Ion Mobility Investigations into Cross-platform and Long-term Robustness of a CCS Metric

Importance of the Topic

Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) with collision cross section (CCS) measurement adds a gas-phase separation dimension to traditional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry workflows. Reliable and reproducible CCS values enhance compound identification confidence in high-throughput small molecule analysis across fields such as forensic toxicology, pesticide screening, food safety, and pharmaceutical research.

Study Objectives and Overview

This study evaluates the long-term stability, intra- and inter-site reproducibility, and cross-platform consistency of CCS measurements for over a thousand small molecules. Three ion mobility platforms—two travelling wave IM-QToF systems and a cyclic ion mobility research instrument—were compared over periods up to four years to assess robustness and library compatibility.

Methodology and Instrumentation

UPLC separation was performed with reversed-phase gradients on conventional and microflow systems. Ions generated by electrospray ionization were separated in travelling wave and cyclic IM devices using nitrogen or helium buffer gas before time-of-flight MS detection. Calibration employed standard CCS kits and lockmass compounds for both mass and mobility dimensions.

Instrumentation

• Waters SYNAPT G2-Si HDMS
• SELECT SERIES Cyclic IMS
• Vion IMS QTof
• ACQUITY UPLC I-Class PLUS with BEH C18 column
• ACQUITY UPLC M-Class with ionKey
• MassLynx, DriftScope, and UNIFI software

Main Results and Discussion

• Inter- and intra-site comparisons of 432 forensic toxicology compounds showed CCS agreement within 2%, with ~79% within 1% across platforms.
• Continuous analysis of steviol glycosides over 45 days and QC standards over 10 weeks yielded CCS deviations below 1% and 2%, respectively, using a single calibration.
• Cross-platform tests between linear TWIM and cyclic IM for fluoroquinolone protomers and flavonoid isomers demonstrated ΔCCS <2% over three years.
• Analysis of 200 pesticides over four years (2000 measurements) showed mean CCS error below 1% relative to reference library values.

Benefits and Practical Applications

Reproducible CCS metrics provide an orthogonal identification parameter that complements retention times, accurate mass, and product ions. This enhances specificity, reduces false positives, and supports robust screening and quantitation workflows in forensic, environmental, food safety, and pharmaceutical laboratories.

Future Trends and Applications

Advances in high-resolution cyclic IM and multiplexed mobility separation will further improve CCS precision. Integration of AI-driven CCS prediction, expansion of open-access CCS databases, and real-time calibration protocols are expected to broaden applications in metabolomics, lipidomics, and large biomolecule analysis.

Conclusion

Collision cross section measurement via IM-MS demonstrates exceptional long-term, cross-platform robustness and reproducibility. Incorporating CCS into routine workflows enhances molecular specificity and confidence in small molecule analysis across diverse research and industrial settings.

References

1. D'Atri V, Causon T, Hernandez-Alba O et al. J Sep Sci. 2018;41(1):20–67.
2. Lanucara F, Holman SW, Gray CJ, Eyers CE. Nat Chem. 2014;6(4):281–294.
3. Giles K et al. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18:2401–2414.
4. Pringle SD et al. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2007;261(1):1–12.
5. Goscinny S, McCullagh M. ASMS Conf 2013.
6. McCullagh M, Goscinny S. Waters App Note. 2014;720005028EN.
7. Goscinny S et al. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019;33(S2):34–48.
8. Giles K et al. Anal Chem. 2019;91(13):8564–8573.
9. Mollerup CB et al. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1542:82–88.
10. McCullagh M et al. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019.
11. McCullagh M et al. Phytochem Analysis. 2019;4:424–436.
12. McCullagh M et al. Anal Chem. 2018;90:4585–4595.
13. European Commission. SANTE/11813/2017.