Evaporative Concentration of Substances Listed in the European Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC). A Performance Comparison Between an Automated System and a Manual System

Significance of Evaporative Concentration in Water Analysis

The determination of trace organic contaminants in environmental waters demands sensitive methods. Evaporative concentration reduces solvent volume to improve detection limits and enables solvent exchange compatible with chromatographic analysis.

Objectives and Study Overview

This work compares performance of the GERSTEL mVAP automated evaporation station coupled to an autosampler with a manual nitrogen blowdown system. A set of 54 xenobiotics listed in the European Water Framework Directive was evaluated at 5 microgram per liter in acetone.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Sample extracts were evaporated at 35 degrees Celsius. The mVAP system used controlled vacuum at 200 mbar with orbital agitation and automated vial wall rinsing. The reference system applied 7 bar nitrogen flow at 20 milliliter per minute. Concentrated samples were analyzed by GC MS using an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph with 5973 mass selective detector, PTV injection in splitless mode, and a five percent phenyl methyl siloxane column in SIM mode.

Main Results and Discussion

Both systems achieved recoveries around 100 percent with relative standard deviations below 10 percent for all target analytes, including volatile compounds. Evaporation times were comparable: 20 minutes for mVAP and 22 minutes for the nitrogen system. The mVAP delivered reproducible results independent of solvent and allowed automated processing of batches of 98 samples, whereas the manual system handled up to 50 samples per batch.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The mVAP offers full automation of sample concentration and integration with sample introduction into LC MS or GC MS workflows. It enhances laboratory efficiency by enabling unattended overnight operation and minimizes manual handling errors.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances may include integration with comprehensive sample preparation steps such as SPE and DPX, miniaturization for microvolume evaporation, and coupling with high resolution mass spectrometry for broader contaminant screening. Automation will continue to support high throughput and green analytical chemistry by reducing solvent use.

Conclusion

The GERSTEL mVAP automated evaporation station matches the performance of manual nitrogen blowdown systems while providing full automation, higher sample throughput, and improved laboratory productivity.

References

1. Ahmed M George SC Changes in molecular composition of crude oils during preparation for GC and GC MS analyses Org Geochem 35 137 155 2004
2. Baez ME Rodriguez M Lastra O Contreras P Solid phase extraction of organophosphorus triazine and triazole derived pesticides A critical study Hrc J High Res Chrom 20 591 596 1997
3. Dettmer K Beck J Gotz U Will R Stieglitz L Automatic Evaporation in PCDD F routine analysis and chlorobenzene routine analysis Chemosphere 27 2111 2116 1993
4. Directive 2000 60 EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
5. Directive 2008 105 EC on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy