LC/HRMS, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/Orbitrap
IndustriesEnvironmental
ManufacturerThermo Fisher Scientific
Significance of the topic
Marine lipophilic biotoxins produced by harmful algal blooms pose a critical food safety risk when accumulated in shellfish. Rapid, accurate screening methods are essential to protect public health and sustain commercial shellfish markets.
Objectives and overview of the study
This work demonstrates a non-targeted screening approach for eight classes of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish tissue using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometry. The method was optimized with certified standards and applied to a mussel reference extract.
Methodology
Sample preparation involved homogenizing mussel tissue in 80% methanol, followed by sequential extraction steps, centrifugation and filtration. LC separation used a reversed-phase C18 column with a 10–90% acetonitrile gradient in 6 min. Full-scan MS data were acquired in alternating positive and negative ion modes at 50,000 resolution, 2 Hz scan rate, and 5 ppm mass window extraction.
Instrumentation
- Thermo Scientific Exactive™ benchtop LC–MS system with Orbitrap analyzer
- Thermo Scientific Accela™ HPLC and Hypersil GOLD C18 column (2.1×100 mm, 1.9 µm)
- HESI-II electrospray ion source
- Polytron PT3000 tissue homogenizer
- Standard mussel tissue reference material (CRM-DSP-Mus-b)
Results and Discussion
Eight toxin standards (okadaic acid, DTX1, DTX2, PTX2, AZA1-3, YTX) were baseline separated in under 6 min. Mass accuracy was <3 ppm in negative mode and <1 ppm in positive mode. Limits of detection ranged from 0.052 to 5.1 µg/L. Analysis of mussel extract yielded okadaic acid and DTX1 at 4.1 and 0.58 µg/g respectively, with ~10% RSD. Observed values were about half the certified levels due to matrix ion suppression, which can be addressed by matrix-matched calibration.
Benefits and practical applications
- Non-targeted full-scan approach detects known and unknown analogues without individual method tuning
- High mass accuracy and resolution ensure selectivity in complex matrices
- Rapid analysis (<6 min) supports high throughput monitoring
- Expandable target list by adding masses in data processing
Future trends and potential applications
Advances in orbitrap resolution and scan speed will enhance detection of trace biotoxins and emergent analogues. Integration with automated data processing and matrix-matched standards will improve quantification accuracy. The workflow can be extended to other food safety and environmental toxin screening applications.
Conclusion
The Exactive benchtop LC–Orbitrap MS system provides a robust, non-targeted screening method for lipophilic marine biotoxins in shellfish. High resolution, full-scan data enable rapid, selective detection and quantification, offering a versatile tool for routine food safety monitoring.
References
- McNabb P et al. Multiresidue method for determination of algal toxins in shellfish: Single-laboratory validation and interlaboratory study. J AOAC Int. 2005;88(3):761–772.
- Fux E et al. Development of an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for detection of lipophilic marine toxins. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1157(1–2):273–280.
- Gerssen A et al. Liquid chromatography-tandem MS for detection of marine lipophilic toxins under alkaline conditions. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216(9):1421–1430.
- Grimalt S et al. Quantification and screening of pesticide residues by UHPLC-triple quadrupole and QTOF MS. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45(4):421–436.
- Krauss M et al. LC–high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to unknown identification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397(3):943–951.
- Kellmann M et al. Full scan MS in residue analysis: How much resolving power is required? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009;20(8):1464–1476.
- Blay P et al. Screening multiple classes of marine biotoxins by LC–high resolution MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400(2):577–585.
- Gerssen A et al. In-house validation of LC-MS/MS for lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish with matrix-matched calibration. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397(7):3079–3088.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.