Simultaneous determination of tetrabutylammonium and tributylamine in wastewater by IC/LC-MS

Applications | 2020 | Thermo Fisher ScientificInstrumentation
IC-MS
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Importance of the Topic


The widespread use of trialkylamines (TAMs) and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) in detergents, disinfectants, and fabric softeners has led to persistent contamination of wastewater and aquatic habitats.
Resistance of QACs to biological degradation and toxicity of cationic surfactants raise ecological concerns, demanding robust methods for trace-level monitoring.

Goals and Study Overview


This work aimed to develop a fast, selective, and sensitive chromatographic workflow for simultaneous determination of tributylamine and its precursor tetrabutylammonium in industrial wastewater.
Key objectives included eliminating derivatization steps, minimizing sample preparation, and achieving low mg/L detection limits with high throughput.

Instrumentation Used


  • Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-6000 system with DP pump and DC detector modules
  • Thermo Scientific ISQ EC single quadrupole mass spectrometer with heated electrospray ionization
  • Dionex IonPac NS1-5µm analytical column with NG1 guard column
  • CERS 500e cation electrolytically regenerated suppressor in external water mode
  • PEAK Scientific Genius NM32LA nitrogen generator
  • Chromeleon CDS version 7.2

Methodology


Samples were simple 10– to 20-fold dilutions of industrial wastewater with deionized water.
An isocratic ion-pair chromatography method used 2 mM formic acid and acetonitrile (56%) at 1.0 mL/min, directly feeding the effluent into the MS detector.
No derivatization or solid-phase extraction was required.
SIM channels at m/z 186.4 for tributylamine and m/z 242.5 for tetrabutylammonium provided selective detection.

Main Results and Discussion


Chromatograms demonstrated baseline separation and symmetric peaks within a 9-min injection cycle.
Limits of detection were 0.023 mg/L for tributylamine and 0.10 mg/L for tetrabutylammonium, with limits of quantification of 0.075 mg/L and 0.32 mg/L, respectively.
Calibration showed r2>0.999 using second-order polynomial fits.
Intra- and inter-day precision for retention time was ≤0.9% RSD and for peak area ≤2.5% RSD.
Mass spectra confirmed no in-source decomposition of tetrabutylammonium to tributylamine.

Benefits and Practical Applications


  • Streamlined workflow with minimal sample preparation reduces analysis time and labor.
  • Isocratic conditions and polymeric column avoid matrix interactions and ensure reproducible retention.
  • Single-quadrupole MS detection provides high selectivity without the need for internal standards.
  • Method can be extended to other low molecular weight TAMs and QACs in environmental monitoring and wastewater quality control.

Future Trends and Potential Applications


Integration of high-resolution MS or tandem MS could further enhance sensitivity and identification of homologous QACs in complex matrices.
Automation of dilution and sample tracking will support high-throughput environmental screening.
Coupling with online solid-phase extraction could lower detection limits and broaden target analyte scope.

Conclusion


A robust IC/LC-MS method was established for direct simultaneous quantification of tributylamine and tetrabutylammonium in industrial wastewater.
The approach combines fast isocratic chromatography, selective MS detection, and simple dilution to deliver low-mg/L detection limits with high precision and throughput.

Reference


  1. Valls M, Bayona JM. Characterization of cationic surfactant markers and their abiotic degradation products. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem. 1991;339:212–217.
  2. Valls M, Bayona JM, Albaigés J. Use of trialkylamines as an indicator of urban sewage in sludges, coastal waters and sediments. Nature. 1989;337:722–724.
  3. Simon P, Lemacon C. Determination of aliphatic primary and secondary amines by HPLC. Anal Chem. 1987;59:480–484.
  4. Djozan D, Faraj-Zadeh MA. Determination of low molecular weight aliphatic amines and polyamines in water by HPLC. J High Resol Chromatogr. 1996;19:633–638.
  5. Zhang N, Wang H, Zhao YZ, et al. Sensitive determination of total aliphatic amines in water using spectrofluorimetry. Microchim Acta. 2008;162:205–210.
  6. Xiongfeng H, Qun X, Rohrer J. Automatic precolumn derivatization for HPLC determination of amines in air. Thermo Fisher Application Note 2016.
  7. Fekete A, Malik AK, Kumar A, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Amines in the environment. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2010;40:102–121.
  8. Ferreira FN, Afonso JC, et al. Determination of low-molecular-weight amines in saline waters by IC after steam distillation. J Sep Sci. 2016;39:1454–1460.
  9. Lewis Z, Jackson BA, et al. Towards a generic method for ion chromatography–mass spectrometry of low molecular weight amines. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019.
  10. Jensen D. Anwendungen zur Bestimmung von Alkali- und Erdalkalimetallen, Aminen und biogenen Aminen in Lebensmitteln. Dtsch Lebensm-Rundsch. 2017;457–463.
  11. Martínez-Carballo E, Sitka A, et al. Determination of selected QACs by LC–MS. Application to water samples in Austria. Environ Pollut. 2007;145:489–496.
  12. Xiang L, Wang XK, et al. Analysis of trace QACs in vegetables by ultrasonic extraction and GC–MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:6689–6697.
  13. Miyamae Y, Matsumoto T, Yoshizawa K, Tsuchiya J. Determination of surfactants using LC/MS. Bunseki Kagaku. 2002;51:921–927.
  14. Hofmann AW. Beiträge zur Kenntniß der flüchtigen organischen Basen. Justus Liebigs Ann Chem. 1851;78:253–286.
  15. Stevens TS, Creighton EM, et al. Degradation of QACs. J Chem Soc. 1928;3193–3197.
  16. Ng LK, Hupé M, Harris AG. Direct GC method for benzalkonium chlorides. J Chromatogr. 1986;351:554–559.
  17. Ding WH, Liao YH. Determination of ADBACs in river water by SPE and GC–MS. Anal Chem. 2001;73:36–40.
  18. Lopez AF, Peralta de Ariza MT, Orio OA. Rapid quantitative determination of tetrabutylammonium bromide by GC. J High Resol Chromatogr. 1989;12:503–504.
  19. Ng LK, Hupé M, Harnois J, Lawrence AH. Direct injection GC–MS analysis for denatonium benzoate. Anal Chem. 1998;70:4389–4393.
  20. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Dionex ERS 500 Suppressor, Product Manual. 2018.
  21. Pohl C. Methods Development Using Ion-Pair Chromatography with Suppressed Conductivity Detection. Technical Note 12. 2000.
  22. Weiss J. Handbook of Ion Chromatography. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH;2016.
  23. Funk W, Dammann V, Donnevert G. Qualitätssicherung in der Analytischen Chemie. VCH;1992.
  24. ISO 8466-2:2001. Water quality – Calibration and evaluation of analytical methods. Beuth Verlag;2001.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Thermo Scientific Dionex eluent suppressors for ion chromatography
Thermo Scientific Dionex eluent suppressors for ion chromatography
2022|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Brochures and specifications
Choosing the appropriate cation-exchange column for quaternary amine determinations
Industrial Ion Chromatography application note compendium
Determination of histamine, agmatine, and putrescine in wine by ion chromatography- single quadrupole mass spectroscopy