<p>🎤 <strong>Presenter</strong>: Robert Cody (JEOL USA INC, PEABODY, MA, USA)</p><p>💾 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/FL_19_CODY_Wed_1330_Pyrolysis_and_GC_GC_MS_2091eb1450.pdf"><strong>PDF presentation</strong></a></p><blockquote><p>💡 <strong>Book in your calendar: </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/events/787"><strong>17th Multidimensional Chromatography Workshop (MDCW)</strong></a><strong> 13 - 15. January 2026</strong></p></blockquote><h3><strong>Abstract</strong></h3><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?instrumentationItems=8-11"><strong>Thermal desorption and pyrolysis </strong></a><strong>(TD/PY) is a valuable sample introduction method for materials analysis with combined gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Polymers can be identified by their characteristic pyrograms, and a database is available for the major pyrolysis products. However, pyrolysis produces much more complex mixtures than can be separated by one-dimensional gas chromatography alone!</strong></p><p>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?instrumentationItems=2-3"><strong>GC×GC-MS</strong></a>) is a useful approach to monitor pyrolysis reactions on a small scale and characterize the products of pilot-plant pyrolysis. High-resolution mass spectrometry and soft ionization methods (chemical ionization, photoionization, and field ionization) are essential tools for the identification of unknowns in these complex mixtures. To view things from a completely different perspective, soft ionization and pyrolysis with a deactivated fused silica column that provides no GC separation shows high-molecular-weight pyrolysis products that are not detectable by GC-MS or GC×GC-MS.</p>

Pyrolysis and GC×GC-MS. A hot topic! (Robert Cody, MDCW 2025)

<p><strong>🎤 Presenter:</strong> <strong>Kirk Jensen </strong>(JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, USA)</p><p>💾 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/paper/32846"><strong>PDF presentation</strong></a></p><h3><strong>Abstract</strong></h3><p><strong>Flow-modulated two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) is an excellent solution for low-boiling point compounds that are difficult to separate by thermal modulation without cryogens. Pairing a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) with GCxGC can offer better dynamic range, increased sensitivity, and lower cost to GCxGC applications, however, many MS instruments can not accept the high flow rate coming from flow-modulated GCxGC.</strong></p><p>In this study, a flow modulator was installed in a QMS system designed to accept high GC flow rates, and tested using perfume and pesticide applications. Results detailing the sensitivity and effectiveness of the QMS system with high GCxGC flow input will be discussed, as well as a comparison to thermal modulation results from the same system.</p><h3><strong>Video Transcription</strong></h3><p>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) has become a powerful tool for resolving highly complex samples that cannot be adequately separated by conventional one-dimensional GC. Traditionally, GC×GC systems rely on either thermal modulation or flow modulation, each offering distinct advantages and limitations.</p><p>In this presentation, Kirk Jensen (JEOL) explores the feasibility of coupling a flow-modulated GC×GC system directly to a high-flow quadrupole mass spectrometer. The work investigates whether modern quadrupole instruments can tolerate substantially higher carrier gas flows than traditionally accepted and what impact this has on chromatographic performance, spectral quality, and compound identification.</p><h4><strong>Fundamentals of GC×GC Modulation</strong></h4><h5><strong>Why GC×GC?</strong></h5><p>GC×GC employs:</p><ul><li>A first-dimension separation column</li><li>A modulation system</li><li>A second-dimension separation column</li></ul><p>The objective is to resolve compounds that co-elute in conventional GC by introducing a second, orthogonal separation mechanism.</p><h5><strong>Thermal Modulation</strong></h5><p>In thermal modulation:</p><ol><li>Compounds eluting from the first column are cryogenically trapped.</li><li>The trapped analytes are periodically released.</li><li>Each release generates a narrow injection onto the second-dimension column.</li></ol><p>Advantages include:</p><ul><li>High sensitivity</li><li>Narrow peak widths</li><li>Intuitive operation</li><li>Excellent focusing of analytes</li></ul><p>However, thermal modulation often requires cryogenic cooling and may present challenges for highly volatile compounds.</p><h5><strong>Flow Modulation</strong></h5><p>Flow modulation operates differently:</p><ol><li>Eluate from the first column fills a sampling loop.</li><li>Valve switching occurs.</li><li>Increased gas pressure transfers the sample to the second column.</li></ol><p>Key advantages include:</p><ul><li>No cryogenic cooling requirements</li><li>Compatibility with highly volatile analytes</li><li>Easier detector splitting (e.g., simultaneous FID and MS)</li><li>Potentially lower operating costs</li></ul><p>The major challenge is the high carrier gas flow required by the modulator, which traditionally exceeds what many mass spectrometers can tolerate.</p><h4><strong>High-Flow Quadrupole MS Concept</strong></h4><h5><strong>Can a Mass Spectrometer Accept More Flow?</strong></h5><p>The study utilized:</p><ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=23&amp;search=JMS-Q1600"><strong>JEOL JMS-Q1600 </strong></a>quadrupole mass spectrometer</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?search=Insight+Flow+Modulator"><strong>SepSolve Insight Flow Modulator</strong></a></li></ul><p>The JMS-Q1600 is specified to accept up to approximately 20 mL/min of carrier gas into the mass spectrometer, making it a suitable platform for evaluating flow-modulated GC×GC.</p><p>Additional instrument capabilities include:</p><ul><li>High scan speed</li><li>Broad dynamic range</li><li>Multiple ionization options:<ul><li>Electron ionization (EI)</li><li>Photoionization (PI)</li><li>Chemical ionization (CI)</li></ul></li></ul><p>The system's pumping capacity was a critical factor enabling these experiments.</p><h4><strong>Experimental Configuration</strong></h4><h5><strong>Chromatographic Setup</strong></h5><p>The GC×GC configuration included:</p><ul><li>First dimension: 5MS column</li><li>Second dimension: BP50 column</li><li>Carrier gas flow: 25 mL/min</li><li>Modulation period: 4.5 seconds</li><li>Oven ramp: 3 °C/min</li><li>Flush flow: 125 mL/min</li></ul><p>The modulation conditions were designed to:</p><ul><li>Fill approximately 75% of the sample loop</li><li>Achieve complete transfer onto the second column</li></ul><p>Mass spectrometric conditions included:</p><ul><li>Electron ionization (EI)</li><li>Mass range: m/z 35–505</li><li>Acquisition rate: 15 Hz</li></ul><p>The relatively modest acquisition rate was selected to reduce spectral distortion previously observed during high-speed GC×GC operation.</p><h4><strong>Application 1: Multi-Residue Pesticide Analysis</strong></h4><h5><strong>Complex Test Mixture</strong></h5><p>A custom pesticide mixture containing:</p><ul><li>246 compounds</li><li>Multiple isomeric species</li></ul><p>was used as a benchmark sample for system evaluation.</p><h5><strong>Separation Performance</strong></h5><p>The flow-modulated GC×GC system successfully generated:</p><ul><li>Significant first-dimension separation</li><li>Additional second-dimension resolution</li><li>Improved visualization of closely eluting analytes</li></ul><p>Three-dimensional chromatographic plots clearly demonstrated the added separation power of the second dimension.</p><h5><strong>Spectral Quality Assessment</strong></h5><p>An important concern was whether introducing 25 mL/min of helium directly into the mass spectrometer would compromise spectral fidelity.</p><p>Findings included:</p><ul><li>Observable spectral skewing</li><li>Reduced NIST match factors</li><li>Highest match factor around 833</li><li>Only four compounds exceeded match factors of 800</li></ul><p>However:</p><ul><li>Probability-based identification scores remained above 95% for many compounds</li><li>Overall identification performance remained surprisingly robust despite spectral distortion</li></ul><p>Approximately 120 compounds were correctly identified from the GC×GC dataset, comparable to previous one-dimensional GC-MS workflows.</p><h4><strong>Application 2: Fragrance Analysis</strong></h4><h5><strong>Simple Perfume Sample</strong></h5><p>An initially tested perfume was already largely separable by conventional GC.</p><p>While GC×GC successfully analyzed the sample, the benefits were limited because the sample complexity did not demand two-dimensional separation.</p><h5><strong>Complex Perfume Sample</strong></h5><p>A second fragrance sample presented a far more challenging matrix.</p><p>Results showed:</p><ul><li>Large unresolved regions in 1D GC</li><li>Significant second-dimension separation</li><li>Resolution of compounds previously hidden within broad unresolved humps</li></ul><p>This application clearly demonstrated the practical value of GC×GC for complex consumer product analysis.</p><h4><strong>Application 3: Petroleum Samples</strong></h4><h5><strong>Diesel Fuel</strong></h5><p>Diesel samples were evaluated as a traditional GC×GC test matrix.</p><p>Even without extensive optimization:</p><ul><li>Clear structured chromatographic patterns were obtained</li><li>Meaningful separation was achieved</li><li>The system handled the high flow successfully</li></ul><p>The presenter noted that further optimization should improve performance substantially.</p><h5><strong>Soy-Based Fuel Samples</strong></h5><p>Soy-derived fuel samples produced chromatographic profiles similar to diesel while revealing additional characteristic regions associated with bio-derived components.</p><p>These experiments further demonstrated the versatility of the approach for petrochemical and renewable fuel analysis.</p><h4><strong>Pushing the Limits: 50 mL/min into the MS</strong></h4><h5><strong>An Extreme Experiment</strong></h5><p>To explore the limits of the system, carrier gas flow was increased from:</p><ul><li>25 mL/min<br>to</li><li>50 mL/min</li></ul><p>directly into the mass spectrometer.</p><h4><strong>Results</strong></h4><p>The mass spectrometer continued operating successfully.</p><p>Observations included:</p><ul><li>Slightly degraded chromatographic performance</li><li>Increased helium load on the vacuum system</li><li>Surprisingly similar spectral quality compared to 25 mL/min operation</li></ul><p>For representative compounds:</p><ul><li>Match factors remained comparable</li><li>Spectral distortion did not increase dramatically</li></ul><p>These findings suggest that the platform possesses substantial operational headroom beyond its nominal specifications.</p><h4><strong>Practical Lessons Learned</strong></h4><p>The presenter shared several important implementation insights:</p><h5><strong>Installation Complexity</strong></h5><p>Flow-modulated GC×GC systems are mechanically complex.</p><p>Key recommendations:</p><ul><li>Use experienced installers whenever possible</li><li>Avoid underestimating setup requirements</li><li>Verify all pressure and column configuration settings carefully</li></ul><p>Installation mistakes can result in extensive troubleshooting and significant delays.</p><h5><strong>Pressure Requirements</strong></h5><p>A 150 psi inlet is preferable to a 100 psi configuration because:</p><ul><li>Additional pressure supports smaller-bore columns</li><li>Greater flexibility is available during optimization</li></ul><p>Pressure limitations became one of the main constraints in the study.</p><h5><strong>Data Acquisition Considerations</strong></h5><p>The presenter noted that:</p><ul><li>15 Hz acquisition may be insufficient for fully optimized GC×GC</li><li>Faster acquisition rates should be investigated</li><li>Improved sampling density would likely enhance peak characterization</li></ul><p>Future work will focus on these data collection parameters.</p><h4><strong>Future Directions</strong></h4><p>Areas identified for further study include:</p><ul><li>Direct comparison with thermal modulation</li><li>Optimization of column geometries</li><li>Evaluation of hydrogen carrier gas</li><li>Evaluation of nitrogen carrier gas</li><li>Improved acquisition rates</li><li>Sensitivity characterization</li><li>Further refinement of flow conditions</li></ul><p>The work remains at an early stage, but the initial results are highly encouraging.</p><h4><strong>Conclusions</strong></h4><p>This study demonstrates that flow-modulated GC×GC can be successfully coupled to a high-flow quadrupole mass spectrometer, even at carrier gas flows far above those traditionally considered practical.</p><p>Key findings include:</p><ul><li>Successful operation at 25 mL/min and even 50 mL/min carrier gas flow</li><li>Effective two-dimensional separations for pesticides, fragrances, and fuels</li><li>Acceptable library-search performance despite some spectral skewing</li><li>Strong potential for future optimization and broader application</li></ul><p>The work challenges conventional assumptions regarding carrier gas flow limitations in quadrupole GC-MS systems and opens new possibilities for simplified, cryogen-free GC×GC workflows.</p><blockquote><p><strong>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</strong></p></blockquote>

Flow-Modulated GCxGC-QMS Analysis Without Splitting Off the GC Flow (Kirk Jensen, MDCW 2026)

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 33, 2026

Article

Product

Events

Webinars

Application

Academy

Video

Poster

Scientists

Plastics

Environment

Food

Water

Health

Presentation

Scientific article

Interview

Toxicology

Popularization

Science and research

Software

Covid-19

Career

Laboratories

Various

Zaměření

Type of News

Focus

The Multidimensional Chromatography (MDC) Workshop draws experts in this exciting field to share and discuss their research.

The Multidimensional Chromatography Workshop

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

European Symposium on Analytical Spectrometry (ESAS) 2026

2026 AOAC INTERNATIONAL Annual Meeting & Exposition

Shimadzu at 2026 AOAC Annual Meeting & Exposition

ICP-MS for Hybrid Photoelectrode Characterization

Modern Methods for Faster Microbial Analysis

Addressing LC Method Optimization - Scaling For Efficiency, Throughput And Reproducibility