<p><strong>This guide explains how to select an appropriate size exclusion chromatography (SEC) column for the analysis of biologics. SEC separates molecules based on their hydrodynamic radius, reflecting their size and shape rather than molecular weight.</strong></p><ul><li>Molecules penetrate the pores of the stationary phase</li><li>There are no chemical interactions with the stationary phase</li><li>Larger molecules elute faster</li><li>Smaller molecules elute later</li></ul><h3><span><strong>Principle of SEC Separation</strong></span></h3><p>The separation mechanism is based on molecular size:</p><p><strong>Large molecules</strong><br>→ do not enter the pores<br>→ travel through the interstitial spaces between particles<br>→ elute earlier</p><p><strong>Small molecules</strong><br>→ enter the pores<br>→ follow a longer path<br>→ elute later</p><h3><span><strong>Key Parameters for Column Selection</strong></span></h3><h4><span><strong>1. Molecule Nature</strong></span></h4><p><strong>Start by evaluating:</strong></p><ul><li>hydrodynamic radius</li><li>molecular shape</li></ul><p><strong>Examples:</strong></p><ul><li>Peptides: ~0.7 nm</li><li>Large biomolecules (e.g., AAVs): ~25 nm</li><li>mRNA: elongated, non-globular structure</li></ul><h4><span><strong>2. Pore Size Selection</strong></span></h4><p>The pore size of the stationary phase should be:</p><ul><li><strong>3–4 times larger than the hydrodynamic radius of the target molecule</strong></li></ul><h4><span><strong>3. Particle Size</strong></span></h4><ul><li>≤ 3 µm</li><li>ensures high separation efficiency</li></ul><h4><span><strong>4. Stationary Phase Material</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Prefer <strong>mechanically robust media</strong>, such as silica</li><li>Capable of withstanding <strong>high back pressure</strong></li></ul><h4><span><strong>5. Surface Chemistry</strong></span></h4><ul><li><strong>Chemical surface inertness is critical</strong></li><li><strong>Diol chemistry is preferred</strong>, because:<ul><li>it minimizes interactions</li><li>it provides a <strong>highly hydrophilic surface</strong></li></ul></li></ul><h4><span><strong>6. Column Hardware</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Use <strong>bio-inert hardware</strong></li><li>ensures:<ul><li>minimal analyte loss</li><li>high reproducibility</li></ul></li></ul><h3><span><strong>Available SEC Column Options (</strong></span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=353&amp;manufacturerItems=50&amp;search=dsec"><span><strong>BioZen dSEC Family</strong></span></a><span><strong>)</strong></span></h3><h4><span><strong>1. </strong></span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/2192"><span><strong>90 Å (9 nm)</strong></span></a></h4><ul><li>peptides</li><li>small proteins</li><li>aggregates up to ~50 kDa</li></ul><h4><span><strong>2. </strong></span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/1534"><span><strong>200 Å</strong></span></a></h4><ul><li>antibodies</li><li>antibody–drug conjugates</li><li>short oligonucleotides</li></ul><h4><span><strong>3. </strong></span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/1535"><span><strong>700 Å (70 nm)</strong></span></a></h4><ul><li>AAVs</li><li>mRNA</li><li>large protein complexes (e.g., IgM)</li></ul><h3><span><strong>Column Characteristics</strong></span></h3><ul><li>silica-based particles</li><li>diol surface chemistry (hydrophilic, inert)</li><li>bio-inert hardware</li><li>designed for:<ul><li>high recovery</li><li>high reproducibility</li></ul></li></ul><h3><span><strong>Performance and Calibration</strong></span></h3><h4><span><strong>Proteins and AAVs</strong></span></h4><ul><li><strong>90 Å</strong> → low molecular weight (up to ~50 kDa)</li><li><strong>200 Å</strong> → medium range (up to ~450–500 kDa)</li><li><strong>700 Å</strong> → large molecules (including AAVs)</li></ul><h4><span><strong>RNA and DNA</strong></span></h4><ul><li>separation of molecules with non-globular shapes</li><li><strong>200 Å</strong> → smaller oligonucleotides</li><li><strong>700 Å</strong> → larger nucleic acid chains (up to ~3000–4000 nucleotides)</li></ul><h3><span><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h3><p>Selecting the correct SEC column requires:</p><ul><li>understanding molecule size and shape</li><li>choosing an appropriate pore size</li><li>selecting suitable particle size</li><li>ensuring inert surface chemistry and bio-inert hardware</li></ul><p>This enables optimal separation of a wide range of biologics.</p>

How to Select the Right SEC Column for the Analysis of Biologics

<p><strong>This technical note presents a practical troubleshooting strategy for one of the most common issues in liquid chromatography (LC): shifting retention times. The approach is based on a systematic distinction between system-related (physical) and chromatographic (chemical) causes.</strong></p><p>A key diagnostic parameter used throughout the process is the <strong>T₀ (dead time)</strong>, representing an <strong>unretained peak</strong> that passes through the column without interaction.</p><h3><span><strong>Key Concept: T₀ (Dead Time / Unretained Peak)</strong></span></h3><p>T₀ is defined as the retention time of a compound that does not interact with the stationary phase and therefore elutes directly with the mobile phase.</p><h4><span><strong>How to Determine T₀</strong></span></h4><p>T₀ can be determined experimentally by adding a marker compound to the system:</p><ul><li><strong>Uracil</strong></li><li><strong>Potassium nitrate</strong></li></ul><p>These compounds are added to a blank or method and produce a measurable unretained peak used for troubleshooting.</p><h3><span><strong>Step 1: Evaluate T₀ Behavior</strong></span></h3><p>The first and most important step is to determine whether <strong>T₀ is constant or variable</strong>.</p><ul><li><span><strong>Case A: T₀ is Variable (Shifting)</strong></span><br>→ Indicates a <strong>system-related (physical) problem</strong><br>&nbsp;</li><li><span><strong>Case B: T₀ is Constant</strong></span><br>→ Indicates a <strong>chromatographic or chemical problem</strong></li></ul><h3><span><strong>System-Related Issues (T₀ is Variable)</strong></span></h3><p>If T₀ is shifting, the problem is likely related to the <strong>LC system hardware or physical parameters</strong>. This is especially true when <strong>all peaks shift together</strong> in the chromatogram.</p><h3><span><strong>Possible Causes</strong></span></h3><ul><li><span><strong>Incorrect Flow Rate</strong></span></li><li><span><strong>Pump Malfunction</strong></span><ul><li>Inconsistent or unstable flow delivery can cause retention time variability.</li></ul></li><li><span><strong>Incorrect Column Length</strong></span><ul><li>Using a column with different dimensions than expected.</li></ul></li><li><span><strong>Solvent Delivery Issues</strong></span><ul><li>Empty solvent reservoir (system running dry)</li><li>Blockages or restrictions (e.g., frits, solvent lines)</li></ul></li><li><span><strong>Tubing or System Volume Changes</strong></span><ul><li>Changes in tubing configuration</li><li>Differences in system dwell (swell) volume</li></ul></li></ul><h3><span><strong>Chromatographic / Chemical Issues (T₀ is Constant)</strong></span></h3><p>If T₀ remains stable but <strong>only specific peaks shift</strong>, the issue is likely related to <strong>chemistry or column conditions</strong>.</p><h4><span><strong>Possible Causes</strong></span></h4><ul><li><span><strong>Incorrect Stationary Phase</strong></span><ul><li>Column with same dimensions but different chemistry (e.g., different silica or bonded phase)</li></ul></li><li><p><span><strong>Ionizable Analytes</strong></span><br>Ionizable compounds exist in:</p><ul><li><strong>Neutral form - </strong>More <strong>hydrophobic</strong>, retained longer on a <strong>reversed-phase column</strong></li><li><strong>Ionized form</strong></li></ul><p><span><strong>Impact of pH</strong></span><br>Small pH changes in the mobile phase can significantly affect:</p><ul><li>Ionization state</li><li>Retention time of specific analytes</li></ul></li><li><span><strong>Mobile Phase Issues</strong></span><ul><li>Old solvents</li><li>Evaporation of volatile components</li><li>Changes in composition</li></ul></li><li><span><strong>4. Temperature Variations</strong></span><ul><li>Temperature affects analyte–stationary phase interactions</li><li>Even small fluctuations can shift retention times</li></ul></li></ul><h3><span><strong>Step-by-Step Troubleshooting Workflow</strong></span></h3><ol><li><span><strong>Add T₀ Marker</strong></span><ol><li>Use uracil or potassium nitrate</li></ol></li><li><span><strong>Monitor T₀</strong></span><ol><li>Determine whether it is constant or shifting</li></ol></li><li><span><strong>If T₀ is Variable → Check System</strong></span><ol><li>Flow rate settings</li><li>Pump performance</li><li>Solvent levels and lines</li><li>Column dimensions</li><li>Tubing and system volume</li></ol></li><li><span><strong>If T₀ is Constant → Check Chemistry</strong></span><ol><li>Column phase</li><li>Mobile phase composition and pH</li><li>Solvent quality</li><li>Temperature stability</li><li>Nature of analytes (ionizable vs. non-ionizable)</li></ol></li></ol><h3><span><strong>Discussion and Practical Insight</strong></span></h3><p>This troubleshooting approach simplifies a complex problem by dividing it into two main categories:</p><ul><li><strong>Physical/system-related</strong></li><li><strong>Chemical/chromatographic</strong></li></ul><p>The use of T₀ as a diagnostic tool allows rapid identification of the problem origin, reducing unnecessary trial-and-error steps.</p><p>Particular attention should be paid to <strong>ionizable compounds</strong>, as they are highly sensitive to <strong>pH variations</strong>, which can lead to significant and selective retention time shifts.</p><h3><span><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h3><p>Retention time shifts in LC can be efficiently diagnosed by evaluating the behavior of the <strong>T₀ (unretained peak)</strong>:</p><ul><li><strong>Variable T₀ → System issue</strong></li><li><strong>Constant T₀ → Chromatographic/chemical issue</strong></li></ul><p>By following this structured approach, analysts can quickly narrow down the root cause and implement targeted corrective actions.</p>

Troubleshooting Retention Time Shifts in Liquid Chromatography 

<p><strong>Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns are highly sensitive to operating conditions, including the composition of the mobile phase and the nature of analyzed samples. Improper handling and unsuitable method conditions can significantly reduce column lifetime. This guide summarizes common causes of column degradation and provides practical recommendations for extending column lifespan.</strong></p><h3><span><strong>Common Causes of Reduced Column Lifetime</strong></span></h3><p>Several factors can negatively affect the performance and durability of SEC columns:</p><h4><span><strong>1. Contamination of the Stationary Phase</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Accumulation of impurities from samples or mobile phases</li><li>Microbial growth due to infrequent replacement of mobile phase</li></ul><h4><span><strong>2. Stationary Phase Degradation</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Caused by unsuitable pH conditions</li><li>Exposure to inappropriate temperatures</li><li>Use of harsh chemical agents</li></ul><h4><span><strong>3. Improper Column Storage</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Incorrect storage conditions may reduce column performance over time</li></ul><h4><span><strong>4. Column Inlet Blockage</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Particulates from insufficiently prepared samples can clog the column inlet</li></ul><h3><span><strong>Preventive Measures and Best Practices</strong></span></h3><h4><span><strong>1. Preventing Contamination</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Use high-quality solvents</li><li>Prepare buffer solutions daily</li><li>Filter both mobile phases and samples before use</li><li>Perform regular column cleaning</li></ul><p><strong>Important note: </strong>Not all SEC columns can be reverse flushed. For example:</p><ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/1534"><strong>Biozen dSEC-2</strong></a> and Yarra SEC-X7 columns <strong>must not be backflushed</strong></li></ul><h4><span><strong>2. Protecting the Stationary Phase</strong></span></h4><ul><li>Operate within recommended pH and temperature limits</li><li>When using strong denaturants (e.g., urea or SDS):<ul><li>Perform immediate and thorough water flushing after use</li></ul></li></ul><h4><span><strong>3. Proper Column Storage</strong></span></h4><p><strong>Before storage </strong>always clean the column thoroughly</p><ul><li><strong>Two storage options:</strong><ul><li><strong>Buffer with bacteriostatic agent</strong> (e.g., sodium azide)</li><li><strong>No buffer:</strong> water with 20% methanol</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>When introducing methanol:</strong></p><ul><li>Use <strong>low flow rates</strong></li><li>Prevent pressure spikes that could damage the column</li></ul><p><strong>When restarting the column:</strong></p><ul><li>Consider that the column contains 20% methanol</li><li>Adjust flow conditions accordingly</li></ul><h4><span><strong>4. Preventing Column Inlet Clogging</strong></span></h4><p>Use protective components:</p><ul><li><strong>Guard column</strong></li><li><strong>Precolumn</strong></li></ul><p>These act as barriers to prevent contamination of the analytical column.</p><h5><span><strong>Types of Protection:</strong></span></h5><ul><li><strong>Security guard cartridges</strong><ul><li>Minimal added length</li></ul></li><li><strong>Short precolumns</strong><ul><li>Same stationary phase as analytical column</li></ul></li></ul><h5><span><strong>Key Advantage:</strong></span></h5><ul><li>Essential for columns that <strong>cannot be backflushed</strong></li><li>Protects against:<ul><li>Poorly centrifuged samples</li><li>Particulate contamination</li><li>Dirty sample matrices</li></ul></li></ul><h3><span><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h3><p>Extending the lifetime of SEC columns requires careful attention to:</p><ul><li>Sample preparation</li><li>Mobile phase quality</li><li>Operating conditions</li><li>Storage procedures</li><li>Use of protective accessories</li></ul><p>Implementing these practices helps prevent contamination, degradation, and mechanical damage, ensuring consistent column performance and longer service life.</p>

Extending the Lifetime of Size Exclusion Columns

<p><strong>Concerns about injecting water into a GC system largely come from older column designs, where stationary phases were simply coated and could be affected by water exposure. Modern capillary columns are typically chemically bonded, which improves resistance to water injections and even supports water rinsing in many cases.</strong></p><p>One practical exception involves <strong>very polar polyethylene glycol </strong>(PEG / “wax”) phases. Because these phases strongly interact with water, repeated aqueous injections can allow water to accumulate and gradually shift selectivity. For many PEG-based columns, minimizing frequent water injections helps maintain consistent performance.</p><p>A separate—and often more important—issue is water’s<strong> very large vapor expansion in a hot inlet</strong>. If the vapor volume exceeds the inlet liner capacity, backflash can occur, sending sample vapor into cooler, unheated zones and increasing the risk of carryover. Using smaller injection volumes helps reduce this risk.</p><p>In workflows where water is the<strong> sample matrix </strong>(for example, volatile analysis), analytes may elute at relatively low oven temperatures while water and higher-boiling residues can linger. Periodic bake-off (high-temperature cleanup steps) is commonly used to restore column performance when water remains on the phase at low temperatures.</p><p>In summary, the biggest hesitation about water injections is rooted in legacy, coated column stories. With chemically bonded phases, the key considerations tend to be inlet expansion/backflash behavior, water retention on very polar phases, and routine maintenance practices like bake-out.</p><blockquote><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/1571"><strong>Zebron ZB-WAX</strong><i><strong>PLUS</strong></i><strong> GC Columns</strong></a></h4><ul><li>100% aqueous stable, excellent for aqueous samples; bonded and solvent rinseable</li><li>Extremely inert for acidic compounds</li><li>Enhanced selectivity for low boiling solvents; high retention of alcohols and chlorinated solvents</li><li>Increased efficiency at 20&nbsp;°C</li></ul></blockquote>

Water in GC: Safe or Risky? Here’s What You Need to Know

<p><strong>There are various ways to categorize gas chromatographic detectors. The main classifications include:</strong></p><ol><li>Detectors sensitive to concentration vs mass flow rate sensitive detectors</li><li>Selective vs universal (non-selective) detectors</li><li>Non-destructive vs destructive detectors</li></ol><p>A<strong> concentration-sensitive detector </strong>is one in which the <strong>peak response depends on the absolute analyte concentration</strong>. At constant concentration, the response is constant regardless of change in flow rate of the carrier gas. If the flow rate changed, there will be no effect on the peak height of the analytes.</p><p>On the other hand, a <strong>mass flow rate sensitive detector</strong> is one in which the<strong> peak response changes with the flow rate of the carrier gas</strong>. In other words, if the carrier gas flow rate is decreased, there will be a proportional decrease in peak height.</p><p><strong>Universal detectors </strong>can see a wider variety of compounds, whilst a<strong> selective detector </strong>is very specific to certain chemical elements or groups.<strong> Non-destructive detectors</strong> maintain the same structure of the analytes as they had whilst passing through the column, while<strong> destructive detectors </strong>break down the actual molecule to produce signals.</p><p>In GC analysis there is<strong> not much significance</strong> if the detector is<strong> destructive or non-destructive </strong>as there is no <strong>preparative work involved</strong>.</p><p><strong>Electron capture detectors</strong> (<strong>ECD</strong>) are <strong>mass flow dependent detectors selective to electronegative elements and they are also non-destructive.</strong> ECD is actually the go-to and most sensitive detector for the analysis of electronegative compounds.</p><p>The carrier gas is ionized by an electron source such as <strong><sup>3</sup>H </strong>or <strong><sup>63</sup>Ni</strong>. A low-energy stream of electrons produces a <strong>steady current </strong>that is magnified and measured. The<strong> current decreases </strong>when an electron-capturing compound enters the detector. Loss of electrons by the electronegative compound is measured as the signal.</p><p>ECD can detect from the picogram to <strong>nanogram level of concentration</strong>. As ECD is selective for electronegative compounds, it is the go-to detector for <strong>halogenated compounds, nitrogen-, oxygen-, and carbonyl group-containing compounds</strong>.</p><h4><strong>Points to Remember About ECD</strong></h4><ul><li>The ECD detector has a radioactive element in it. Maintenance of the detector should be performed only by qualified professionals with appropriate radioactive shielding. Hardware disposal is strictly regulated by local legislation.</li><li>The ECD is compatible with ultra-high-purity nitrogen and helium as the carrier gas.</li><li>Since the detector is a mass flow rate detector, there is a proportional impact on peak area and peak height with change in flow rate. The method should be run under constant flow mode for quantitative analysis.</li><li>Nitrogen or argon-methane mixture can be used as makeup gases. The makeup gas flow and composition should be optimized for higher sensitivity and maintained constantly between consecutive runs to obtain reproducible quantitative results.</li><li>The detector should operate at the temperature mentioned in the detector’s user manual. Usually, the upper limits are 350–400 °C, depending on the manufacturer and model. Most ECDs are equipped with automatic shut-down if the temperature limit is exceeded.</li><li>The carrier gas used for analysis should be free of oxygen, moisture, and halocarbons to extend detector lifetime and avoid baseline problems.</li></ul><p>ECDs can be baked out at higher temperatures to clean them. However, the<strong> bakeout temperature should not exceed the maximum limit </strong>mentioned in the detector’s user guide. Since ECD contains a radioactive beta particle source, no attempt should be made to<strong> clean the detector mechanically</strong>.</p>

What You Need to Know About Electron Capture Detectors

<p><strong>Low analyte recovery is one of the most common challenges encountered during Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) sample preparation. In this Phenomenex Video Tip, Genevie Hodson, Senior Manager of Technical Support and Applications at Phenomenex, explains a practical troubleshooting approach for situations where analyte recovery after an </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=6&amp;manufacturerItems=50"><strong>SPE </strong></a><strong>procedure is lower than expected.</strong></p><p>The key objective of troubleshooting is not simply to identify that recovery is low, but to determine exactly where the analyte was lost during the extraction process. Once the point of loss has been identified, corrective actions can be implemented systematically.</p><h3><strong>Fundamental Principle of SPE Recovery Troubleshooting</strong></h3><h4><strong>Determine Where the Analyte Is Going</strong></h4><p>The most important step when troubleshooting low recovery is to identify the location of the missing analyte.</p><p>The process begins with the assumption that the sample originally contained 100% of the target analyte. If the final recovery is lower than expected, some portion of the analyte has been lost during SPE processing.</p><p>To identify the loss point, each fraction generated during the SPE procedure must be collected and analyzed separately.</p><h5><strong>Fractions to Collect</strong></h5><p>During the SPE workflow, the following fractions should be collected individually:</p><ul><li><strong>Load fraction (flow-through)</strong></li><li><strong>Wash fraction(s)</strong></li><li><strong>Elution fraction</strong></li></ul><p>Each collected fraction is transferred into a vial and analyzed using the laboratory’s analytical method.</p><p><strong>The analytical results reveal whether the analyte is:</strong></p><ul><li>Present in the load fraction</li><li>Present in one of the wash fractions</li><li>Present in the elution fraction</li><li>Missing from all collected fractions</li></ul><p>The location of the analyte provides direct information about the root cause of the recovery problem and guides the next troubleshooting steps.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 1: Analyte Detected in the Load Fraction</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><ul><li>If the analyte appears in the load fraction, it was not retained by the SPE sorbent during sample loading.</li><li>Instead of binding to the stationary phase, the analyte passed directly through the cartridge.</li></ul><h5><strong>Possible Causes</strong></h5><ol><li><strong>Incorrect Phase Selection</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The selected SPE sorbent may not be appropriate for the analyte being extracted.</li><li>If the analyte cannot interact effectively with the sorbent chemistry, retention will not occur.</li></ul><ol start="2"><li><strong>Excessively Strong Sample Solvent</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The sample may be dissolved in a solvent that is too strong.</li><li>A strong sample solvent can prevent proper interaction between the analyte and the sorbent, causing breakthrough during loading.</li></ul><ol start="3"><li><strong>Incorrect pH Conditions</strong></li></ol><ul><li>Retention often depends on maintaining the analyte in the correct ionization state.</li><li>If the sample pH is not appropriate, the analyte may not interact correctly with the sorbent and therefore will not be retained.</li></ul><ol start="4"><li><strong>Sorbent Overload</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The SPE cartridge may have received:<ul><li>Too much analyte</li><li>Too much sample matrix</li></ul></li><li>When sorbent capacity is exceeded, analytes can break through the cartridge and appear in the load fraction.</li></ul><h5><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h5><p>When overload is suspected, increasing the amount of sorbent can improve analyte retention and prevent breakthrough.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 2: Analyte Detected in the Wash Fraction</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><p>If the analyte appears in the wash fraction, it was initially retained but subsequently removed during the washing step.</p><h5><strong>Possible Causes</strong></h5><ol><li><strong>Wash Solvent Too Strong</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The most common cause is an overly aggressive wash solvent.</li><li>A wash solution with excessive elution strength can remove the analyte before the intended elution step.</li></ul><ol start="2"><li><strong>Incorrect pH During Washing</strong></li></ol><ul><li>When pH control is required for retention, the same conditions must be maintained throughout the process.</li><li>A pH change during washing may alter analyte retention and cause premature elution.</li></ul><h5><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h5><p><strong>Review:</strong></p><ul><li>Wash solvent composition</li><li>Wash solvent strength</li><li>pH conditions during washing</li></ul><p>Adjustments should ensure that the analyte remains retained until the elution step.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 3: Analyte Missing from All Fractions</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><ul><li>If the analyte is not found in the load fraction, wash fractions, or elution fraction, it is likely still retained on the SPE sorbent.</li><li>In this situation, the analyte has not been effectively eluted from the cartridge.</li></ul><h5><strong>Possible Cause</strong></h5><p><strong>Elution Solvent Not Strong Enough</strong></p><ul><li>The final elution solvent may lack sufficient strength to remove the analyte from the sorbent.</li><li>As a result, the analyte remains bound to the stationary phase and never reaches the collection vial.</li></ul><h4><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h4><ul><li>Increase the strength of the elution solvent during the final SPE elution step.</li><li>A stronger solvent can improve analyte desorption and recovery.</li></ul><h3><strong>Summary of Low Recovery Troubleshooting Strategy</strong></h3><p>The recommended troubleshooting workflow consists of four steps:</p><h4><strong>1. Collect All SPE Fractions</strong></h4><p><strong>Gather:</strong></p><ul><li>Load fraction</li><li>Wash fraction(s)</li><li>Elution fraction</li></ul><h4><strong>2. Analyze Each Fraction Separately</strong></h4><p>Use the analytical method to determine where the analyte is located.</p><h4><strong>3. Identify the Root Cause</strong></h4><div><div><h5><strong>Analyte Location&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp;&nbsp;Likely Cause</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Load fraction:</strong> Incorrect phase, strong sample solvent, incorrect pH, sorbent overload</li><li><strong>Wash fraction: </strong>Wash solvent too strong, incorrect pH</li><li><strong>Not found in any fraction:</strong> Incomplete elution from sorbent</li></ul></div></div><h4><strong>4. Apply Corrective Measures</strong></h4><p><strong>Modify:</strong></p><ul><li>Sorbent selection</li><li>Sample solvent composition</li><li>pH conditions</li><li>Sorbent amount</li><li>Wash solvent strength</li><li>Elution solvent strength</li></ul><h3><strong>Other Common SPE Issues</strong></h3><p>In addition to low recovery, several other SPE-related problems are commonly encountered.</p><p><strong>These include:</strong></p><ul><li>Contamination</li><li>Reproducibility Problems</li><li>Flow-Related Issues</li></ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>Successful troubleshooting of low SPE recovery depends on identifying where the analyte is lost during the extraction process. Collecting and analyzing individual SPE fractions provides a systematic method for locating the analyte and determining the underlying cause of poor recovery.</p><p>Whether the analyte passes through during loading, elutes during washing, or remains bound to the sorbent after extraction, fraction-based investigation enables targeted corrective actions. This structured approach allows SPE methods to be optimized efficiently and helps restore acceptable analyte recovery.</p>

SPE Troubleshooting: Understanding and Resolving Low Recovery in Solid Phase Extraction

<p><strong>Solvent switching is the process of changing the solvent contained within a liquid chromatography (LC) column. This procedure must be performed carefully to avoid irreversible damage to the column.</strong></p><p>The topic originates from a common customer question:</p><blockquote><p>“My column arrived in hexane, but I need to use it with water and acetonitrile. How do I switch the solvents in the column?”</p></blockquote><p>This article explains the solvent switching process, how to determine the solvent currently inside a column, how to select an appropriate transition solvent, and why proper solvent switching is essential.</p><h2><strong>Step 1: Determine the Shipping Solvent</strong></h2><p>Before changing solvents, it is important to know which solvent or mobile phase is already present in the column.</p><p>This information can typically be found in:</p><ul><li>The column care guide</li><li>The Certificate of Quality Assurance (CQA)</li></ul><h4><strong>Using the Column Care Guide</strong></h4><p>The column care guide is usually available on the manufacturer's website under the specific column brand.</p><ul><li>In the <strong>Shipping Solvent</strong> section, users can identify the solvent in which each phase is supplied.</li><li>The <strong>Mobile Phase Compatibility</strong> section can be used to determine whether the phase has any mobile-phase limitations beyond pH restrictions.</li></ul><h4><strong>Using the Certificate of Quality Assurance (CQA)</strong></h4><p>The CQA also provides useful information.</p><p>Under the <strong>Test Conditions</strong> section, the mobile phases used to test the column are listed.</p><ul><li>In the example shown in the video, a Luna column was tested using:<ul><li>75% acetonitrile</li><li>25% water</li></ul></li></ul><p>The testing conditions are often the same as the shipping solvent conditions, although this is not always the case.</p><p>If uncertainty remains, the recommendation is to contact the column manufacturer directly.</p><h3><strong>Step 2: Check Solvent Miscibility</strong></h3><p>Once the shipping solvent is known, the next step is to verify whether it is miscible with the mobile phases used in the analytical method.</p><p>A solvent miscibility chart can be used for this purpose.</p><h4><strong>Water and Immiscible Solvents</strong></h4><p>The video highlights that water is immiscible with several commonly used LC solvents, including:</p><ul><li>Hexane</li><li>Dichloromethane (DCM)</li><li>Heptane</li></ul><p>These solvents are commonly used under normal-phase conditions.</p><h4><strong>Isopropanol as a Transition Solvent</strong></h4><p>The video identifies <strong>isopropanol (IPA)</strong> as a solvent that is miscible with all LC solvents shown in the chart.</p><p>Because of this property, IPA is commonly used as an intermediate or transition solvent when switching between:</p><ul><li>Water and hexane</li><li>Water and heptane</li></ul><h3><strong>Step 3: Perform the Solvent Switching Procedure</strong></h3><p>After selecting an appropriate transition solvent, the solvent exchange can begin.</p><p>The procedure described in the video consists of the following steps:</p><h4><strong>1. Flush with the Transition Solvent</strong></h4><p>Flush the column with the selected transition solvent for:</p><ul><li>30–60 column volumes</li></ul><h4><strong>2. Flush with the Pure Starting Solvent</strong></h4><p>After the transition solvent, flush the column with:</p><ul><li>10 column volumes of the pure starting solvent</li></ul><h4><strong>3. Equilibrate with the Method Mobile Phase</strong></h4><p>Finally, equilibrate the column using the mobile phases required for the analytical method.</p><h3><strong>Example Solvent Switching Protocol</strong></h3><p>The video provides the following example.</p><h5><strong>Initial Column Solvent</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>The column arrives packed in:</strong><ul><li>99% hexane</li><li>1% acetonitrile</li></ul></li></ul><h5><strong>Transition Solvent</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Use:</strong><ul><li>Isopropanol (IPA)</li></ul></li><li><strong>Flush the column with IPA for:</strong><ul><li>30–60 column volumes</li></ul></li></ul><h5><strong>Intermediate Step</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Flush with:</strong><ul><li>10 column volumes of acetonitrile</li></ul></li></ul><h5><strong>Final Equilibration</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Equilibrate with one of the following:</strong><ul><li>50% acetonitrile / 50% water</li><li>50% acetonitrile / 50% buffered water</li></ul></li></ul><h3><strong>Why Proper Solvent Switching Is Important</strong></h3><p>The video emphasizes that improper solvent switching can cause irreversible column damage.</p><p>Potential issues include:</p><h4><strong>Formation of Voids and Pockets</strong></h4><p>Immiscible solvent transitions can create:</p><ul><li>Pockets within the packed bed</li><li>Voids at the column inlet</li></ul><p>These defects can permanently damage column performance.</p><h4><strong>Salt Precipitation</strong></h4><p>If buffered mobile phases are involved and pure solvents are not used appropriately during the transition, salts may precipitate from solution.</p><h4><strong>Damage to Pressure-Sensitive Polymer Media</strong></h4><p>Pressure-sensitive polymer-based media may burst during improper solvent transitions.</p><h4><strong>Stripping of Coated Phases</strong></h4><p>Columns containing coated stationary phases or coated ligands may experience removal of these coatings during unsuitable solvent changes.</p><h3><strong>Irreversibility of Column Damage</strong></h3><p>According to the video, once damage caused by immiscible solvent exposure occurs, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to reverse.</p><p>For this reason, solvent changes should always be performed through an appropriate intermediate solvent whenever required.</p><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>Successful solvent switching begins with identifying the solvent in which the column was shipped. The miscibility between the shipping solvent and the intended mobile phases must then be evaluated. When immiscible solvents are involved, an appropriate transition solvent such as isopropanol should be used.</p><p>Following a controlled sequence of flushing, intermediate solvent exchange, and equilibration helps prevent permanent column damage and ensures safe operation of the chromatographic column.</p>

Solvent Switching in Liquid Chromatography Columns: How to Change Column Solvents Safely

<p><strong>In this troubleshooting tip, Genevie Hodson, Senior Manager of Technical Support and Applications at Phenomenex, addresses a common solid phase extraction (SPE) question:</strong></p><blockquote><p><strong>"My sample won't flow through my SPE cartridge. Why is this happening?"</strong></p></blockquote><p>Several factors can contribute to flow problems during SPE. A systematic troubleshooting approach can help identify the root cause and restore proper cartridge performance.</p><h3><strong>Identifying When the Flow Problem Occurs</strong></h3><p>The first step in troubleshooting is determining <strong>when</strong> the flow issue appears.</p><p>Ask the following question:</p><ul><li>Does the problem occur during the <strong>sample loading step</strong>?</li><li>Or does it occur <strong>before sample loading</strong>, during cartridge conditioning or when running blanks?</li></ul><p>The timing of the problem can help identify its underlying cause.</p><h3><strong>Cause 1: Viscous or Cloudy Samples</strong></h3><h4><strong>Description</strong></h4><p>Samples that are thick, highly viscous, or contain large amounts of particulate matter can restrict flow through the SPE sorbent.</p><h4><strong>Recommended Actions</strong></h4><p>Before SPE, the sample should be:</p><ul><li>Diluted</li><li>Centrifuged</li><li>Filtered</li></ul><p>Another option is selecting a sorbent with a larger particle size.</p><h4><strong>Example</strong></h4><ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=6&amp;manufacturerItems=50&amp;search=x"><strong>Strata-X</strong></a> – 33 µm particle size</li><li><strong>Strata XL</strong> – 100 µm particle size</li></ul><p>The larger particle size of Strata XL is better suited for viscous samples and can improve flow performance.</p><h4><strong>When This Problem Appears</strong></h4><p>If sample viscosity or particulate content is the cause, the flow issue will typically occur during the <strong>sample loading step</strong>.</p><h3><strong>Cause 2: Insufficient Manifold Pressure</strong></h3><h4><strong>Description</strong></h4><ul><li>Flow problems may originate from the SPE manifold or instrumentation.</li><li>The applied pressure must be sufficient to generate proper flow through the cartridge.</li></ul><h4><strong>Recommended Actions</strong></h4><p>Check:</p><ul><li>The SPE manifold</li><li>Associated instrumentation</li><li>Individual manifold positions</li></ul><p>In some cases, a specific position within the manifold may be responsible for the problem.</p><h4><strong>When This Problem Appears</strong></h4><p>If manifold pressure is the issue, poor flow will typically be observed during:</p><ul><li>Conditioning steps</li><li>Blank runs</li></ul><h3><strong>Cause 3: Immiscible Solvents</strong></h3><h4><strong>Description</strong></h4><p>Using solvents that are not mutually miscible can interfere with flow through the SPE cartridge.</p><h4><strong>Recommended Actions</strong></h4><p>Always use solvents that are miscible with each other.</p><h4><strong>Example</strong></h4><ul><li>Hexane</li><li>Water</li></ul><p>These solvents are immiscible and may cause flow problems if used together.</p><h4><strong>When This Problem Appears</strong></h4><p>Flow issues caused by solvent incompatibility are generally observed during:</p><ul><li>Conditioning steps</li><li>Blank runs</li></ul><h3><strong>Cause 4: Precipitation and Protein Build-Up</strong></h3><h4><strong>Description</strong></h4><ul><li>Sample constituents or proteins may precipitate and clog the sorbent bed.</li><li>This blockage can significantly restrict or stop flow through the cartridge.</li></ul><h4><strong>Recommended Actions</strong></h4><p>Possible corrective actions include:</p><ul><li>Diluting the sample</li><li>Reducing sample volume</li><li>Avoiding denaturing solvents</li><li>Washing the sorbent with a low ionic strength buffer before the regular wash step</li></ul><h4><strong>When This Problem Appears</strong></h4><p>If protein precipitation or sample-derived precipitates are responsible, the flow problem will typically occur <strong>after the sample has been loaded</strong>.</p><h3><strong>Systematic Troubleshooting Approach</strong></h3><p>When investigating SPE flow issues, use a systematic elimination strategy.</p><h3><strong>Key Principle</strong></h3><ul><li>Evaluate one variable at a time and isolate potential causes individually.</li><li>This approach helps identify the true root cause rather than changing multiple parameters simultaneously.</li></ul><h3><strong>Summary of Common SPE Flow Problems</strong></h3><h5><strong>Cause &nbsp; / &nbsp; Typical Observation Point &nbsp; / &nbsp; Suggested Solution</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Viscous or cloudy sample: </strong>During sample loading - Dilute, centrifuge, filter, or use larger particle size sorbent</li><li><strong>Insufficient manifold pressure: </strong>Conditioning or blanks - Check manifold and instrumentation</li><li><strong>Immiscible solvents:</strong> Conditioning or blanks - Use only miscible solvents</li><li><strong>Precipitation or proteins: </strong>After sample loading - Dilute sample, reduce volume, avoid denaturing solvents, use low ionic strength buffer wash</li></ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>Flow problems in SPE can arise from several common sources, including viscous samples, insufficient manifold pressure, incompatible solvents, and precipitation of sample components or proteins. Determining exactly when the problem occurs during the SPE workflow is a critical first step in troubleshooting. A systematic, one-variable-at-a-time approach allows the root cause to be identified efficiently and corrective actions to be implemented.</p>

SPE Troubleshooting: Why Won't My Sample Flow Through the SPE Cartridge?

<div><p><strong>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represent a vast class of more than 3,000 synthetic compounds containing perfluorinated chains (with the general formula CnF₂n+₁COOH), commonly utilized in a wide range of consumer products and industrial processes.</strong></p><p>The unique structure of PFAS, characterized by multiple carbon-fluorine (C-F) bonds, contributes to their <strong>exceptional chemical stability and resistance</strong> to degradation through environmental or biological processes. This durability makes them some of the <strong>most persistent pollutants in the environment</strong>. Their resistance to water and oil has led to widespread use in diverse applications, including water- and stain-repellent coatings for textiles, paints, personal care items, firefighting foams, fluoropolymer-based lubricants and additives, as well as grease- and water-resistant food packaging. Due to their extensive use, PFAS have been found in various environmental and biological samples, such as <strong>food, drinking water, wastewater, and human blood</strong>.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Why PFAS Testing Is Crucial?</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p>Like many other chemicals, PFAS can cause<strong> </strong>various <strong>harmful health effects</strong>, depending on factors such as the level, duration, and route of exposure, as well as individual characteristics like age, sex, ethnicity, overall health, and genetic background. PFAS exposure has been linked to various health effects in both sexes, with some impacts supported by high certainty evidence—such as <strong>thyroid disease, liver damage, kidney cancer, and testicular cancer</strong>.</p><p>In females, PFAS may also affect pregnancy outcomes and fetal development, including increased miscarriage risk, reduced birth weight, and delayed mammary gland development. Because of their toxic nature, these compounds have been classified as “persistent organic pollutants” by the<strong> Stockholm Convention</strong> (including PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and their salts) and by the <strong>European Commission</strong> (including PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxA). Their durability, chemical stability, harmful effects, and tendency to build up in living organisms make them a serious risk to both environmental and human health; hence, PFAS testing is crucial for monitoring and mitigating these threats.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>PFAS Testing Techniques</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p>PFAS testing employs advanced techniques to detect, identify, and quantify both known and emerging compounds across diverse environmental matrices.</p><h5><strong>Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)</strong></h5><p>LC-MS is a <strong>commonly used PFAS testing method</strong>. Samples are first processed using suitable preparation techniques, such as <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=136&amp;manufacturerItems=50"><strong>solid phase extraction </strong></a>(SPE). The resulting extracted samples are then examined using LC/MS/MS with calibration performed via standards. Target analytes are identified with help of isotopically labeled surrogate standards. . Additionally, product ion ratios are compared with those from standards to support identification. Once confirmed, the concentration of each identified target compound is determined based on the response of its main product ion using external standard calibration.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h4><strong>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)</strong></h4></div></div></div></div><div><p>Non targeted analysis of PFAS has largely been dominated by LC-MS methods, although GC-MS can access a complementary chemical space, especially for volatile and semivolatile PFAS. Studies show that LC‑MS covers most ionic PFAS; GC‑MS captures neutral/volatile precursors less amenable to LC, highlighting the need for GC-based approaches. GC is particularly valuable for identifying novel PFAS and transformation products from sources like manufacturing waste, incineration, wastewater, and consumer products.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h4><strong>Total Organic Fluorine (TOF)</strong></h4></div></div></div></div><div><p>Total Organic Fluorine (TOF) analysis is an indirect method used to estimate the overall burden of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other organofluorine compounds in a sample. Instead of targeting individual PFAS molecules, TOF methods quantify the sum of organically bound fluorine.</p><p>Because this process measures the organic fluorine present within a sample, it provides a helpful bulk measurement of fluorine from all PFAS present, including those which may not be covered by targeted LC-MS/MS methods.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h4><strong>High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)</strong></h4></div></div></div></div><div><p>HRMS is increasingly used to detect emerging PFAS, with two main strategies applied for identification: suspect screening (SS) and non-target screening (NTS). SS is a more direct method, particularly effective when tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) reference spectra are available. In contrast, NTS is critical for uncovering new PFAS compounds in the absence of a suspect list, using fragment-based or homologue-based techniques.</p><p>HRMS contributes significantly by offering precise mass measurements, which are essential for identifying unknown substances. Since PFAS often form homologous series, patterns in accurate mass, retention time, and common fragments (such as CF₂, C₂F₄, and CF₂O) help in their recognition.</p></div><div><div><div><div><h3><strong>Choosing the Right Testing Method</strong></h3></div></div></div></div><div><p>C-MS/MS is the primary technique used for targeted PFAS analysis due to its high sensitivity and accuracy. It is validated by the U.S. EPA through established methods such as 1633, 533, and 537.1 for detecting PFAS in various environmental and drinking water samples. For laboratories seeking reliable and compliant workflows, choosing a comprehensive <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.phenomenex.com/industries/pfas">P<strong>FAS analysis solution</strong></a> that aligns with these regulatory methods is essential for accurate detection and quantification.</p><ul><li><strong>EPA Method 1633</strong> is designed for use under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to measure the levels of 40 different PFAS in various sample types including water, soil, biosolids, sediment, and biological tissue, using <strong>LC-MS/MS</strong>. Weak anion exchange solid phase extraction (WAX-SPE) is employed for extracting various sample matrix types, and PFAS compounds are quantified through calibration with isotopically labeled internal standards.<br>&nbsp;</li><li><strong>EPA Method 533</strong> utilizes weak anion exchange solid phase extraction (WAX-SPE) followed by LC-MS/MS to detect 25 specific PFAS in drinking water, including short chain PFAs. This method employs tandem mass spectrometry and isotope dilution to improve analytical selectivity.<br>&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Method 537.1 </strong>involves extraction via SDBL reversed phase SPE combined with LC-MS/MS for detection of 18 specific PFAs compounds, including the novel GenX compound. This method involves <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.phenomenex.com/documents/pfas-in-drinking-water">PFAS detection in drinking water</a> samples.</li></ul></div>

Guide to PFAS Testing Methods

<p><strong>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that have been widely used since the 1940s in industries and consumer goods. They are found in products like water-repellent clothing, stain-resistant fabrics, cosmetics, firefighting foams, and grease-, water-, and oil-resistant items. For instance, PFAS are commonly present in non-stick cookware used in everyday life. Their persistence and long biological half-lives have resulted in measurable levels in nearly all people in developed countries, with associated PFAS human health effects reported worldwide.</strong></p><p>Evaluating PFAS health risks requires understanding their adverse health effects at real-world exposures, particularly during sensitive life stages, along with their modes of action, toxicokinetics, and dose-response relationships. This knowledge supports risk estimates that guide public health limits, exposure reduction, and environmental cleanup efforts.</p><h3><strong>Why are PFAS a Health Concern?</strong></h3><p>PFAS have a chemical structure with a perfluorinated carbon tail that repels both water and oil and an anionic head group that attracts water, making them highly resistant and persistent. As a result, they do not break down and instead accumulate in the bodies of people and animals worldwide through food and repeated exposures. They even bio-magnify through the food web. Growing evidence has raised concerns about the harmful effects of PFAS on human health.</p><p>In the human body, PFAS bind strongly to proteins due to their polar, hydrophobic nature and have been detected in serum, cord blood, and breast milk. Unlike many other bio-accumulative contaminants, they do not tend to accumulate in fat tissue.</p><h3><strong>PFAS Testing Techniques</strong></h3><p>PFAS have a chemical structure with a perfluorinated carbon tail that repels both water and oil and an anionic head group that attracts water, making them highly resistant and persistent. As a result, they do not break down and instead accumulate in the bodies of people and animals worldwide through food and repeated exposures. They even bio-magnify through the food web. Growing evidence has raised concerns about the harmful effects of PFAS on human health.</p><p>In the human body, PFAS bind strongly to proteins due to their polar, hydrophobic nature and have been detected in serum, cord blood, and breast milk. Unlike many other bio-accumulative contaminants, they do not tend to accumulate in fat tissue.</p><p>While animal studies show that most PFAS are primarily excreted through urine, renal clearance in humans is much slower, raising significant concerns for PFAS human health. The slow elimination contributes to the long-term effects of PFAS on humans.</p><p>PFAS have extended half-lives, with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) persisting for approximately 3.5 years and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) for roughly 4.8 years. Some studies also report a range of 2.3 to 3.3 years. These findings highlight serious PFAS health risks, demanding the need for continued monitoring and risk assessment.</p><h3><strong>Known and Suspected Health Effects of PFAs in Humans</strong></h3><h4><strong>Immunological effects</strong></h4><p>Epidemiological studies have shown that PFAS exposure is linked to weakened immune responses, including reduced antibody levels after vaccinations such as diphtheria, tetanus, rubella, and mumps, with these effects persisting into adolescence and adulthood.</p><p>Prenatal and early-life exposure to PFAS has been linked to higher risks of infections such as airway, throat, and gastrointestinal illnesses, as well as conditions like atopic dermatitis. Overall, the evidence on PFAS and human health suggests that exposure to PFAS during infancy and childhood can suppress the immune system, though some effects may differ by sex.</p><h4><strong>Liver disease and cancer</strong></h4><p>The liver is a major site for long-chain PFAS accumulation, with experimental studies showing toxic effects such as fat infiltration in liver cells, apoptosis, disrupted fatty acid metabolism, and even tumor development. Animal toxicology and histology studies indicate that PFAS can alter liver metabolism, causing increased bile acid reuptake and lipid buildup. These findings demonstrate the effects of PFAS on liver function and long-term disease risk.</p><h4><strong>Kidney diseases</strong></h4><p>PFAS exposure has been consistently linked to higher uric acid levels, a biomarker of increased risk for kidney disease, in both adults and children. The prolonged half-lives of long-chain PFAS are largely due to strong kidney reabsorption. Human studies link legacy PFAS such as PFOA and PFOS exposure to reduced kidney function and chronic kidney disease. PFOA and PFOS health effects can also be seen in the body where these substances tend to accumulate in kidney tissues causing nephrotoxicity.</p><h4><strong>Reproductive outcomes</strong></h4><p>Exposure to PFOA has been linked to reduced sperm motility, lower sperm concentration and count, and hormonal changes in young men. PFAS can also cross the placenta and accumulate in breast milk, allowing transfer from mother to child. As a result, young children often have higher serum PFAS levels than their mothers.</p><h3><strong>How do PFAS enter the Environment and Food Chain?</strong></h3><p>Human exposure to PFAS occurs through multiple pathways. These may vary from exposure to indoor air and dust to ingestion of contaminated water and food, particularly in areas near industrial sites. Thus, PFAS human health concerns may arise from:</p><ul><li><strong>Water:</strong> PFAS contaminate public and private drinking water sources, rivers, and groundwater near industrial areas, landfills, and waste sites. Firefighting foams (AFFFs) used at airports, military bases, and training facilities are a major contributor, raising concerns about PFAS chemicals health effects on the communities dependent on these resources.</li><li><strong>Soil and Air: </strong>They spread through soil and air around hazardous waste sites, manufacturing facilities such as chrome plating, electronics, textiles, paper, and through biosolids used as fertilizers.</li><li><strong>Food:</strong> PFAS enter the food chain through contaminated fish, seafood, dairy, meat, crops, and animal products. Food packaging such as grease-resistant paper, fast-food wrappers, and microwave popcorn bags also contribute PFAS to the environment.</li><li><strong>Household and Consumer Products:</strong> Everyday items like stain- and water-resistant fabrics, non-stick cookware, cleaning agents, paints, sealants, and certain personal care products (shampoo, dental floss, cosmetics) release PFAS into homes.</li><li><strong>Exposure Pathways: </strong>This is an area of growing research, it is currently understood that people are being exposed to PFAS through various means, including drinking contaminated water, eating contaminated food, inhaling polluted air or dust, swallowing soil, using PFAS-containing products, or working in high-risk occupations such as firefighting and chemical manufacturing.</li></ul><h3><strong>Importance of Accurate PFAS Testing</strong></h3><p>Accurate<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.phenomenex.com/industries/pfas"><strong> PFAS testing solutions</strong></a> are essential to measure the presence of environmental chemicals and metabolites in human tissues and fluids. Testing can provide a clearer picture of total internal exposure from all sources and pathways. The wide diversity of PFAS, with varying chemical and physical properties, requires the development of tailored analytical procedures that depend on the sample type and medium.</p><p>The choice of biological sample depends on the specific PFAS of concern, with serum most often used to measure those with long half-lives, while urine or whole blood may be better for short-lived compounds. PFAS can also be detected in plasma, breast milk, and hair, each providing unique insights into exposure at different life stages. For example, hair can reflect historical exposures, and breast milk testing helps estimate infants intake, which is a significant concern for many communities that have been exposed to these substances.</p><p>Because PFAS detection limits are 1,000 times lower (ppt) than routine analyses (ppb), strict precautions such as verifying PFAS-free supplies are essential to prevent sample contamination, which can still occur from vendor or manufacturing changes. Extremely low detection limits and regulatory criteria is in the parts per trillion (ppt) range. Hence, field QC sample collection and analysis are crucial in investigating the effects of PFAS on humans.</p>

Health Risks Associated with PFAS Exposure

Article

Product

Events

Webinars

Application

Academy

Video

Poster

Scientists

Plastics

Environment

Food

Water

Health

Presentation

Scientific article

Interview

Toxicology

Popularization

Science and research

Software

Covid-19

Career

Laboratories

Various

Zaměření

Type of News

Focus

Phenomenex is a global technology leader committed to developing novel analytical chemistry solutions that solve the separation and purification challenges of researchers in industrial, government and academic laboratories.

Phenomenex

Restek at ISC 2026

Thermo Fisher Scientific at ISC 2026

Waters at ISC 2026

Managing 4D-STEM data with smarter acquisition

Streamlining Endotoxin Testing: Automated Sample Preparation and Audit-Ready Workflows for QC Laboratories

Software Workflows for Environmental Microplastics Analysis by Py-GC-MS